I can also be emailed at my site email address thecinemasnob@yahoo.com
Welcome to the new home of The Cinema Snob. Previously featured on YouTube before ultimately being ousted by the powers that be (those powers being the people behind "Nail Gun Massacre")
thecinemasnob.com will feature all of the Snob's videos, old and new, and also brand new shows and full length original movies for those of us who already can't get enough of Z-Grade Cinema.
7/5/2010 7:55 PMLouis wrote:
i totally agree..ive never seen the movies or read the books..but it does have good potential..but it was ruined by fangirls. no offense to your wife though. Reply to this
7/9/2010 8:52 PMN.B. Yomi wrote:
Trust me, the book isn't as good as people make it sound. Everything is told to you. descriptions of Edward take up a good chunk of the book. Every character is well developed except the main protagonists Edward and Bella. And the book is loaded with pointless padding that contributes nothing to the plot. Reply to this
7/5/2010 7:56 PM
Spam wrote:
If books and films was food, then the Twilight series would be the nuts in my shit! Reply to this
7/5/2010 8:00 PMDrkstlkr7 wrote:
Nice spin on getting kicked out this time. I think this might be my favorite review of Eclipse yet. I was thinking how much better the movie would be if it was about one of the backstories or Charlie monologing about Bella's bullshit. Reply to this
7/5/2010 8:00 PM
BluValkyrie wrote:
I've gone on record saying I HATE Twilight before, and as far as I am concerned, the movies are just an abomination made from a series that is a crime against humanity and good taste Reply to this
7/5/2010 8:00 PM
DaftRaider wrote:
I still can't tell if Jillian's joking or not, she's that good of an actor. Reply to this
7/5/2010 8:02 PM
Gunny wrote:
Oh, dude, you NEVER talk about their breasts when they're mad at you... also, neat kitties! Reply to this
7/5/2010 8:02 PM
The Goddamn Master wrote:
Is it me or does Jillian have a little too much fun with these reviews? Damn fine job as always, and, unfortunately, you're completely spot-on with every single part of your little tirade. Also, good Lord, your cats are crazy! Reply to this
7/5/2010 8:09 PM
Riah wrote:
This movie could have been better if they hadn't put Kristen Stewart as the lead. She is an awful actress, I have to admit. Also, they should have paid more attention to the subplots of the other characters. They are all really interesting, but they just skim over them in the movie. Alice and Jasper's in particular aside from Rosalie's and the rest of the family. I mean, come on: an abused teen locked in an asylum for being able to see the future, a confederate vampire and a rape victim that kills people in her wedding dress? Who wouldn't want to see that?
I guess we'll have to live with the adequate version we were spoon-fed.
PS- I do not imagine the cat is happy about being tossed when he interrupts the shot. Not taken out of it, but she kinda threw him on that last one. They don't always land on their feet. Reply to this
7/6/2010 4:07 AM
qwrtyp wrote:
You must be kidding or not a cat owner. If that hurts your cat, it must be seriously ill. Reply to this
7/6/2010 11:11 AM
Riah wrote:
I own two cats AND I've worked at a veterinary clinic for the last six years. I've seen cats break legs from hopping off the couch. Plus, if they fall from a relatively low distance and are not right way up, they don't always have the time for their instinct to fall on her feet to kick in. Reply to this
7/6/2010 11:59 AM
Son_Of_Jack_Deth wrote:
While it is always sad when a cat breaks it's leg, it is at least comforting to know that they will taste great in feline stew. I mean once they break their leg you might as well enjoy them one way or another. Reply to this
7/6/2010 6:03 AM
Samael wrote:
Kristen Steward is a fine enough actor. Not great, just fine. At least from what I saw in her other movies. So either she got an aneurysm while reading the script or there is only so much you can do with this tripe. Reply to this
7/6/2010 11:14 AM
Riah wrote:
She just has no emotional range. And most of time she looks like she's reading the script while doing the scene. I don't know, she just isn't my favorite actor. Reply to this
7/5/2010 8:14 PMLC wrote:
I Love these twilight reviews I hate the movies but i hope they make another one just so i can see brad do another review Jarrid needs to get a cot for when the next twilight come out just so brad has a place to sleep lol Reply to this
7/5/2010 8:18 PM
MoonMan wrote:
Hey brad, Have you seen "LET THE RIGHT ONE IN"? please tell me you have! It is the best Vampire movie ever made and unfortunately it is getting remade in America because Americans are really scarred of subtitles. IT's getting Remade as "LET ME IN". Please watch the original before watching the remake. It is the best vamp movie! Reply to this
7/5/2010 9:43 PMTrevor wrote:
I saw the trailer....I hate shot-for-shot Americanized remakes. And yes, it is a Fantastic Vampire movie. Reply to this
7/23/2010 3:13 PM
Rock Martin wrote:
Can you blame us? How can we pay attention to both the subtitles AND what's going on onscreen? Reply to this
7/5/2010 9:57 PM
ChaosD1 wrote:
That was "Together Forever". It's Rick Astley's OTHER song that sounds almost exactly the same. Reply to this
7/9/2010 4:54 PM
Emma wrote:
I thought so too! I was considered being annoyed, but frankly it would have been pretty epic, so I'm cool with it. Reply to this
7/5/2010 8:58 PM
Gravemind wrote:
lol, that was awesome! But I hope you are aware of the fact that your cat totally stole the show ^^ Reply to this
7/5/2010 9:22 PMMartialHorror wrote:
lol, I 100% agree. The best scene in the movie was the bride sequence. I was like "Holy crap this is going to be awesome" then it cuts away and I was like "Nooooooooooo!". These movies make me very emotional for the wrong reasons. Reply to this
7/5/2010 9:22 PM
Arttic wrote:
XD Best review ever. I have never been able to get through your reviews when you do them, but this one was really good XD
Everyone loves Charlie, but I think it's because he acts like an actual person both in book and movie. There's even a fan fic called "Edward the Sugar Queen" where he's in fact the main character (course he's gay and in love with Edward but trust me it's way better XD) Reply to this
7/5/2010 9:25 PM
Hariman wrote:
That was hilarious. Now I have to go and watch the other two Twilight reviews.
Political side note: Eh, screw it. I'm not getting political here. Review = Funny. Jillian = Good Sport + Funny + Daunting. Pet Kitty = Cute. Reply to this
Not to worry! My girlfriend went crazy for the Twilight Saga, and I think they're mediocre to crap! Looks like when the two-part finale comes out, we'll both be sleeping on a friend's couch? Oh, is it possible for you to put up the original audio of Jillian's review? Reply to this
7/5/2010 9:48 PM
bassbait wrote:
What Rick Astley song was that at the end? Because they all sound like Never Gonna Give You Up, but that one sure wasn't. Was it "Together Forever"? Reply to this
7/5/2010 9:58 PMKevin Sutton wrote:
Great review. I'm kind of wondering now what Jillian was saying the whole time... unless she was made to mime for the whole ten minutes.
I don't think you can take the angst, shirtlessness, or the silly Mary Sue out of Twilight; because that was the point of the story and the appeal of the audience it was made for. Reply to this
7/5/2010 10:24 PM
Aluysion wrote:
I know people who both hate or love this whole series. I'm right there with saying the background characters are at least ten times more interesting and human like (despite being sometimes not human) then the main characters. The movie should be about them, I don't care about Edward or Bella, they're both annoying and whinny. Frankly, Bella's character makes Dakota Fannings evil little sadistic power look like puppies and unicorns. Bella's a bitch in more ways then just being pretentious and blowing people off. Every character has more heart and ideals then she does, even if they're the fucking evil bad guys. That being said, Jillian is very cool to let you make vids totally bashing the series while she loves it. Funny enough, most Twilight fans don't mind a good parody making fun of it, proving they often know how ridiculous it is at some parts, while still being compelled to like the series due to other factors. Awesome review, totally said absolutely everything about the series with out mindless bashing, pointing out flaws and being someone who "gets it" but still doesn't get why others like it so much. Reply to this
7/5/2010 10:32 PMOstsol wrote:
I've not watched more than a trailer of any of the movies, but I love Twilight -- solely because it produces gems like this review. Reply to this
7/5/2010 11:22 PM
diggerjohn111 wrote:
A vuvuzela and the shit that is Twilight in the same review, you have encapsulated this summer brilliantly! Reply to this
7/5/2010 11:24 PM
TrangleC wrote:
A very entertaining review, even to people who have 0 interest in the movie. I especially liked the vuvuzela joke. Reply to this
7/5/2010 11:32 PM
PalaceOfWisdom wrote:
Did You even do a review of the first one? because I cannot find it on the site
The first one i the only one i saw and I must say I wasnt totally bored because of the hilariously bad dialoge and delivery of it. anyway, nice review and defnetly watch "let the right one in". There is even a dubbed version, but aside from the two leads its sometimes quite bad voiceacting Reply to this
7/6/2010 1:40 AM
Jael wrote:
Hi Brad, I just wanted to correct you on two things. One, Rosalie Hale was not gang raped in the 1800's, she was raped in the 1930's and one of the rapists was her douchebag fiance at the time. And Jasper acts like he has the rage virus in the first two movies because he feasted on human blood for over a century, so he hasn't fully adjusted to being a vegetarian vampire.
Of course, you probaby don't care. And before anyone decides to flame me, yes, I love Twilight. But I am also a huge Cinema Snob fan and I watched every video back to the bad-lighting days. Hell, I probably know more about Bruno Mattei than I do about Bella Swan!
Overall, I love the ending and love how you dubbed your own opinions over Jillian's dialouge. That alone makes this the best Eclipse review I have seen to date. Reply to this
7/6/2010 2:05 AM
Anonymous wrote:
Oh my God a vagetarian vampire, Hahahahahaha I can't believe this shit, is this serious? This Stephenie Meyer ever suprises me with something to crack me up. hahahaha I guess that the Vampires actually in the end may be aliens, judging by the new book of this writter. (The Host) hahahaha What drugs are this woman in, really, hahaha OMG. Reply to this
7/6/2010 4:11 AM
qwrtyp wrote:
Abstinent vampires should not be your biggest problem with these books/films, it's not a new or bad concept. Reply to this
7/6/2010 5:01 PM
KSK wrote:
I prefer my Vegetarian Vampires to be named Duckula, Let's get the Cullens a case of Ketchup. Reply to this
7/6/2010 2:25 AM
PlasticLion wrote:
I'm going to risk getting gang raped myself here by siding with you. A lot gets cut between book and movie.
These movies succeed(financially no one can deny that) the way that Last Airbender fails. Too much exposition confused newcomers and annoyed the show's fans. The Twilight movies appeal to the books fan base not newcomers.
I don't really love these movies but I don't walk away from them feeling like I just watched an abstinance psa. Reply to this
7/6/2010 2:46 AM
PlasticLion wrote:
I mean it's not like it's an after school special. Had to browse to find the name of the one that I remember: "Too Soon For Jeff. High school senior finds his future plans turned upside down when his girlfriend tell him she is pregnant."
Brad you should review an after school special. It would be hilarious. Reply to this
7/6/2010 1:50 AMJezka wrote:
UGH how I HATE the Twilight movies... like hell, I read the books, and I saw the first movie (bootleg YAY I didn't pay for that crap) and it was nothing like the book, not even close! The entire cast (save for Charlie and Carlisle) are complete crap and just AUGH I have no words to describe my hatred for these movies and the stupid fangirls it has created. I'll stick with the Women of the Otherworld series by Kelley Armstrong, k thnx.
Oh, and your wife is such a good sport for playing along with this and your kitty did steal the show... damn cats, they're such glory hogs Reply to this
7/6/2010 2:53 AM
Humanitiesinsainity wrote:
I would love to see twilight vampires fight Real Fucking vampires, like the ones from the Blood the last vampire series, that would be fracking awesome, seeing Ciropterian rips Edward's glittery head of and just eat Bella's bitchy white ass , I would pay money to see that ( I am a sick bastard, ain't I?). Also, I would pay money to see a civil war vampire movie. Reply to this
7/6/2010 3:07 AM
Anonymous wrote:
I liked this review a lot, though that static when you cut her off were really loud. Reply to this
7/6/2010 3:22 AM
glenn wrote:
Brad, mate, you followed the plot details way too closely to make the rant entirely convincing! Anyway these film related battle of the sexes issues are easily solved. Just nod indulgently, interjecting the occasional "no!" and "then what happened?". Or casually mention that, in this case, Kirsten Stewart is really pretty. Kills any girl film stone dead almost instantly. Of course, the relationship counselling takes months. Reply to this
7/6/2010 5:08 AM
Karma wrote:
Couldn't get past 19 seconds in the video before I vomited all over myself, and had to stop the video before I had a full on seizure.
I spent almost a half hour waiting for the feeling to come back in my right arm, so that I could clean the puke off my floor and off of myself, because of this video.
7/6/2010 1:08 PMJack wrote:
You know that about 20 seconds in, her audio cuts out and Brad starts trashing the movie over her right? Reply to this
7/6/2010 5:16 AM
Invisible Crane wrote:
Watching this makes me wonder how Brad and Jillian get along with each other despite the fact that Jillian likes Twilight while Brad (and 99.9% of males everywhere) hate it Reply to this
7/6/2010 8:05 AM
dennett316 wrote:
Because different tastes in movies are nothing to end a relationship over. There are other facets to their personalities than simply taste in movies. For instance, her boobs did indeed look nice...so they've got that going on. Reply to this
7/6/2010 5:37 AM
Petoht wrote:
The slow, Jaws-like approach of the vuvuzela cracked me up more than anything. Well, that and the cats. Reply to this
7/6/2010 5:58 AM
executor wrote:
Haha, you two are fucking awesome. Would like to write more, but I'm still trying to breath. Possibly best review EVER!
LOL <- for real! (Ok, kind of, sort of... ) Reply to this
7/6/2010 7:21 AM
Rattrap007 wrote:
Hilarious man.. Truly the best review of it i've seen. I've only seen the series with a Rifftrax and even THAT is painful.. i think Lloyd had a thing or two to say.. the cat steals the show every time. He needs to cameo in about every review.
The Vuvuzela joke was hilarious. as soon and the audio went back to her I thought you may be done.. then slowly the horn comes into the shot and I lost it.
If she owns the movies on DVD i suggest the Rifftrax for them. Actually makes them tolerable and enjoyable.. shocking but true.
But you are dead on with this series. The only likable people are the two Dads.
Edward is a pouty ass. Bella is mentally unstable and a bitch. Jacob is a stalker... and so on.
I hope the next movie is Twilight meets Van Helsing and they all die.. Reply to this
7/6/2010 7:25 AM
Boyland wrote:
I have no interest in Twilight sorry to all the ladies who like these series. Vampire films can be good bye not making it about sex look at Let the Right one in. Kristin Stewart is not sexy, she in real life is supposed to be really boring and not as pretty as you think. Robert Pattinson is annoying as I cant see what girls see in him, hes a way faced little twerp. The shirtless bloke thing is annoying as hell, if a owman was topless for most of the movie firstly people would moan about objectivacation, second it would not be a pg13. Rant over. Reply to this
7/6/2010 12:18 PM
Mr. Rubino wrote:
Objectivacation? I'm getting an image of Ayn Rand on the beach writing a travelogue. Reply to this
7/6/2010 7:51 AM
Patrick wrote:
I can't believe no one has caught this...Twilight is pretty much Buffy The Vampire Slayer Seasons 1-2
Edward, The Vampire who does nothing Vampirish. Loves the girl that he shouldn't
Angel, The Vampire with a soul does nothing Vampirish until loses soul. Loves the girl that he shouldn't
Both characters have an exact same look
Buffy and Bella both have annoying friends hanging around during high school. Both dealing with the stress of getting through school
The only difference is they throw in some Werewolves and i'm a total dork lmao Reply to this
7/8/2010 6:52 PM
Steven wrote:
Do not insult buffy, the most relative, intriguing, and honest show from the 90s, by comparing it to this tripe... thank you Reply to this
7/6/2010 8:41 AM
CM wrote:
First off, I hate the idea of Twilight. Vampires don't sparkle! But, just because you can't keep it in your pants doesn't mean others can't. The "primary" function of sex is to reproduce. If you don't have a relationship with someone that you are willing to have a child with then you shouldn't be having sex. And don't bother with comments about condoms. A friend of mine had one break on him and now he has a kid with a stripper who doesn't give a shit about him. My God people, we could literally stop the spread of AIDS today if people learned self control. And you can forget that "test drive" crap too. If you were truly in love with someone would you break up with them because the sex wasn't that great? That's something that can be worked on. What if sex with your wife became impossible due to some illness? Would you cheat on her because it would be "unrealistic" not to have sex? It's amazing how peoples brains stop working when their trying to justify something. I actually heard someone compare it to testing a new food! FOOD? Food doesn't get you pregnant or give you VD's. And on the religious side (whether you believe in it or not it is a basis for many peoples belief in abstinence) God created sex to be between couples who have made the ultimate commitment to each other. The fact that it is a reproductive act should clue you in to sex being intended for people who are ready to create a family. You are projecting your inability to control yourself on others to make you feel less guilty. I's like an overweight person saying that it is "unrealistic" and "stupid" to eat healthy food. Reply to this
7/7/2010 10:21 PM
DuskQ wrote:
Your friend didn't know how to use a condom. No question about it. Putting a condom on correctly is part of safe sex. 99.99% effective is not an estimate. These are the ONLY way they break: they're too old (three years or more), they were used against other latex for "double protection" (instead the friction of latex upon latex caused tears), he didn't pinch and hold so there was no room for the ejaculation, he thought he was bigger than he was so the condom slipped, he washed it, reused it, or kept it between the folds of his wallet and/or someplace hot decreasing the effectiveness through wear.
And oh, really abstinence is the way to fix AIDS? You figured it out what social and medical scientists have been writing dissertations on for over 2 decades. Congratulations! Now go tell the people who were infected by their spouses because they thought they were being monogamous that they should have been abstinent with the partners. Or go tell the young girls being sex trafficed that if they don't let men rape them that they will never catch it. OR just tell the girl next door who knows if she doesn't have sex when and how her partner wants it then he'll just find someone else who will. (Sure there's an issue of self esteem there but chances are he will leave) Even then you won't stop sharing needles, or rape in prisons. But I guess you have all the answers.
This movie doesn't even promote real abstinence. Edward and Bella have every meaningful conversation in a bedroom or else laying down together. They're quick to feel each other up, but do not actually talk about the difference and limits between actual penetration and these VERY sexual make out sessions of theirs. If you really believe in abstinence your boyfriend should NOT be sleeping in your bed every night. Let's see how well that works out!
And I'm esp. pissed about your assumption that all overweight people eat unhealthy food. Some people aren't built to be a size 2. There are big people who run everyday, and there are skinny people with type 2 diabetes. Reply to this
7/6/2010 8:46 AM
CM wrote:
And for those who think the Bible is prudish and uptight about sex, read Song of Solomon! Reply to this
7/6/2010 1:17 PMBrad wrote:
It should be illegal to teach abstinence in place of safe sex. Abstinence leads to naivety and disease and unwanted pregnancies. Safe sex does not mean go out and fuck anything that moves. It means actually having some smarts about sex, and being able to choose whether or not you want to engage in it or not. And if you choose to do it, then atleast you'll have been taught how to do it safely. Reply to this
7/6/2010 3:19 PM
Anonymous wrote:
With all due respect, your statement, "Abstinence leads to naivety and disease and unwanted pregnancies", is patently absurd.
Basic biological fact: Abstinence is the only 100% guaranteed way to PREVENT disease and unwanted pregnancies.
Your contention that it somehow leads to "naivety" is equally unfounded.
Young people in 2010 have no shortage of access to info about the mechanics of sex (including every form of contraception--how to use it, etc.).
When it comes to sex, about the only message young folks today AREN'T getting is, "It's OK not to.". Reply to this
7/6/2010 4:00 PMBrad wrote:
The definition of abstinence certainly doesn't lead to any of that; but when people are taught this, they aren't taught about safe sex. Then you have young people who get caught up in the heat of the moment and who have not been properly taught about how to do it safely. It's abstinent "programs" that I have a problem with. You shouldn't be left to find out about safe sex on your own, you should be taught it. Abstinence programs promote naivety. They do result in unwanted pregnancy and disease, because safe sex is not taught by these programs. This isn't unfounded, it's a proven fact, I've seen it myself; my grade school and high school taught this BS. Reply to this
7/10/2010 10:41 AM
Anonymous wrote:
An abstinence program, like anything else, can be done well or done poorly.
There is, in fact, a considerable body of evidence that, when implemented properly, abstinence programs can and do achieve successful results.
Anyone interested in investigating this subject further may find the item below to be a good place to start:
7/6/2010 4:48 PM
HaloOfTheSun wrote:
That's not really true at all. Well, the part about it being the only way to prevent unwanted pregnancies, etc. is true of course, but the idea that abstinence is not promoted as much as anything else to teens is complete bullshit.
Safe sex is hardly taught to teens, and taught correctly with accurate information even less so. Of course the facts are out there, but it isn't what's being shoved in their face all the time.
My wife had a lot of classes in college that dealt with and discussed this subject and she would have a field day with the ridiculousness of your comment. Reply to this
7/10/2010 11:09 AM
Anonymous wrote:
There was nothing "ridiculous" about my comment.
The larger culture today (including just about any major media outlet you care to name), in innumerable subtle (and not so subtle) ways continually conveys the messages, "Virginity is for losers", "Everybody's doing it.", etc. to young people.
Messages to the contrary are few and far between indeed.
I do not know what was taught in the college classes to which you refer.
But having spent a considerable chunk of my own life on university campuses, I've learned long ago that the difference between what is said and done within the "ivory tower" and the way things are in the real world is, not infrequently, the difference between day and night. Reply to this
7/6/2010 7:43 PM
Raventail wrote:
You point out a core flaw with abstinence programs. You assume teens and other young people will listen to you 100%. Simply saying "Don't do it" will be enough. Abstinence programs only serve to blot out the idea of sex entirely, rather then imparting wisdom and knowledge to teens with raging hormones. Remember those years? We all had them and we can all agree we made stupid mistakes during that point in our life.
So I'm with Brad on teaching in depth knowledge on safe sex. Heck, encouraging masturbation would be a step in the right direction cause that comes with 100% protection from pregnancies and VD's. But then again you're going the bible route so that would be another no-no... Reply to this
7/10/2010 11:24 AM
Anonymous wrote:
Abstinence programs do not simply assume teens will listen "100%", nor do they simply say "Don't do it", etc. (read the item I included in my post above).
And I'm pretty sure the kids have already got the masturbation thing down pat.
Would that the youngsters today had as little difficulty in locating their own country on a map as they do in locating their own zipper. Reply to this
7/6/2010 10:32 PM
ScreamingDoom wrote:
This is absurd. Nature really, really, really, really, desperately wants you to have sex. It is, functionally, the entire point of being alive -- you live pretty much only so you can reproduce. As a result, there are HUGE biological impetuses to make people go screw and titanic amounts of resources dedicated so species can go get their freak on. These impulses are not easy to ignore, especially when one is a teenager.
Abstinence programs make the bizarre assumption that rebellious, irritated teenagers hopped up on hormones and perhaps other substances will think about sex in a rational, completely non-emotional way. This is absurd on multiple levels.
It's far better to just assume teens will do it regardless of what you say and try to make the best of the cruel hand that hateful bitch Mother Nature has dealt all species with gender by teaching ways to lessen the risks.
It's much easier to go on a diet, after all, than to just stop eating entirely. Reply to this
7/10/2010 11:50 AM
Anonymous wrote:
Abstinence programs make no such assumption (see the item included in my post above).
Of course, sexual urges are very powerful. No one denies that.
But what is equally undeniable is that such urges are CONTROLLABLE, and the decision to engage in sexual activity is DELAYABLE.
And there is really no connection with eating/going on a diet.
If one does not eat food or drink water, he/she will die.
Not so with one who chooses to delay engaging in sexual activity. Reply to this
7/7/2010 12:17 PM
diggerjohn111 wrote:
Brad is absolutely right. God forbid that people actually have respect for a teen's ability to make their own decisions. History has shown us that to preach or to legislate any kind of prohibition of anything pleasurable leads to far worse consequences than anything that it was intended to prevent. Reply to this
7/10/2010 12:27 PM
Anonymous wrote:
There is a reason why a person has to be certain age before they can legally use alcohol or tobacco, drive a car, enter into a legally enforceable contract, etc. (not to mention the very existence and purpose of "age of consent" laws themselves).
When it come to most teens(specifically, ones that are still minors)two facts stand out:
1)They have no real world life experience on which to base any decisions they might make (this is also why, as a parent, it is generally a pointless endeavor to attempt to argue or negotiate with them).
2)Their parents/legal guardians are legally and financially responsible for them. Thus, said youngsters are effectively shielded from most of the consequences of their actions. If they get into a jam, someone else will pull them out of it.
Thus, in and of itself, the notion of "respecting a teen's ability to make their own decisions" (in the sense being discussed here) is, to say the least, a generally unwise proposition.
Abstinence programs are not about "prohibition". At root, they are about instilling self-control (see the item I shared in my post above). Reply to this
7/6/2010 11:38 AM
jessica wrote:
still bums me out that the guy who made 30 Days of Night directed this. he went from actual scary vampires to......this....ugh.
gotta love the vuvuzela bit or when your cat is all up in the camera all "just what ARE they talking into all the time?"
i was expecting a "I love you???" at the end but talking about her boobs seems more fitting. I'm a girl and i had to think and say "huh he's right."
and at least jerrid doesnt get kicked out of his place lol i can just imagine you too having to sleep outside or something. or at least on that rockin kitchen couch Reply to this
All I can say is if I want to see REAL vampires and werewolves ripping each other apart in a massive brawl, I will stick with Underworld: Rise of the Lycans. Thank you very much XD Reply to this
7/6/2010 12:46 PM
Fix It Jones wrote:
Has he done reviews of the other Twilight movies and Can someone point me to them if he has? Reply to this
7/6/2010 1:22 PM
nick wrote:
There is a review for New Moon under the "Movies and TV Reviews" archive but not one for Twilight. Reply to this
7/6/2010 1:51 PM
MisterKeitel wrote:
Brad- Ah yes. This was comedy gold. No myself, I've never seen any of the Twilight movies, despite the fact that my sister's daughter want me to see it with them. Yeah right, just as soon as they see Near Dark, Nosferatu, Day Breakers and Blade 1 & 2 (but not 3) with me first. Ha. However, maybe this is just the rock and roll of the young people was we old guys just can't get in to it. My dad was never able to appreciate what Heavy Metal meant to me and I've never been able to sit through any opera with him. Next, I'd like from you more 80's retrospectives. Like Sword and the Sorcerer or this David Caradine fantsy movie that I think is called DeathSport, along with Circle of Iron and the original Death Race 2000 (not the Jason Strathem junk that came later). Or the Richard Lynch made for TV 1979 flick Vampire (even though it's technically the late-70's and the 80's really didn't begin until the introduction of new wave music and styles in 1981 with Thomas Dolby, Kaza Goo Goo, Duran Duran, Flock of Seagulls, Bannana Rama, and other pop icons that will love FOREVER.....ha... Reply to this
7/6/2010 2:34 PM
Predak wrote:
Sword and the Sorcerer, seriously? That movie was. . .not good. Though I heard they're currently making its sequel, due to come out this year or next. Reply to this
7/6/2010 6:22 PM
MisterKeitel wrote:
Dude- I don't know what you're talking about. The original S&S was all kinds of awesome! But I did find this so-called sequel on Imbd and watched the trailer online and OMFG was that horrible. I mean, that's a classic example of how CGI can multiply the suck Q of any movie. Thanks for responding. I implore you to give the original another chance....Ha. Reply to this
7/6/2010 3:08 PM
Faust wrote:
Great review Brad...really funny. I liked the bit with the vuvuzela....not terribly original but well performed. Reply to this
7/6/2010 3:09 PM
Fhqwhgads wrote:
Is there a version of this of the original review of your wift though? I'd really like to hear it even though it will be the same as for movie 2. Reply to this
7/6/2010 3:50 PM
WilhelmofCoal wrote:
Oh my God, getting dragged to see this movie with my best bud by my sister and two of our female work friends was worth it to understand this review. Seriously, there was not one single thing I didn't think of/agree with in this review (the things Brad said anyway). This review along with my first "Ethnic Movie Theater Experience" have proven to fulfill my entertainment dollars spent. I thank you from the bottom of my soul. Reply to this
7/6/2010 7:38 PM
Storm Fire wrote:
Oh, great job on the review. I never really cared for the books or movies. I've read at least a few pages of the first book and I nearly threw up in my mouth because of it. The books gave me this impression "hey boys and girls its okay to be a complete controlling asshole to your lover. Also, its okay to be emotionless and think its okay go kill yourself." Ack, this whole series is just a complete waste of time, and teaching people the wrong things in my opinion. If the books/movies where more interesting I would care a lot more. Reply to this
7/6/2010 7:39 PM
Kayna wrote:
I love this review. Funny, accurate, and wonderful. I hate everything about this series. Both books and movies. I watched the first movie because I like vampires films but it was horrible! I tried to read the books at the urging of some friends, who's literary advice I will never take again. Why is this crap popular? I can't believe that this crap is what's being marketed to young women these days. Bella is a noncharacter. No personality whatsoever. And this is what we're supposed to be identifying with? I'm insulted. I really am.
And yeah, the two leads obviously don't actually want to have anything to do with these piles of garbage. Watch some of thier other stuff, they're not bad actors. In this though. Nothing.
The whole Twilight seires needs more vuvuzela. It would be greatly improved but it. Reply to this
7/6/2010 10:42 PMDan wrote:
The only reason why crap like Twilight is popular is because MTV and teen magazines tell young girls that this is what they should like no questions asked. On top of that some of the people who have seen this wretched movies have seen little to none actually good films, if those same people gave something like Interview With The Vampire or even something like Near Dark a chance they would realize how much shit this series is. I completely agree with you on the points you made about this film! Reply to this
7/6/2010 8:43 PMshadowdancer21b wrote:
Stephenie Meyer is Mormon, so of course abstinence is going to be a focal point of her romance story. Also, Twilight sucks and Stephenie Meyer and her views are not a good representation of other Mormons. Thanks for your time. Shadowdancer out! Reply to this
But I don't think cat is amused by Twilight either. Reply to this
7/6/2010 10:53 PM
Scarlet wrote:
Follow up to the last comment...I will agree that the side characters are far much more interesting than the main cast. I don't care for Twilight to begin with, but the vampire sibling family have much more interesting bg.
7/7/2010 4:18 AM
DragonCurse4 wrote:
Well this movie isn't so much as anti-sex as it is anti-sex until after marriage. That's right Edward is a christian vampire. God this movie is dumb. Reply to this
7/7/2010 9:24 AM
Sammantha wrote:
Kristen Stewart is a decent actress. Just not good enough to play the lead role. I think she is one ofthe main reasons I do not like the movies. She could play a supporting character and it wouldn't be as bad. I am also annoyed at how much the little fan girls lust over Edward, Jacob and even the ones that lust over Bella. It is like Twilight is made just to be masturbation material for teenage girls with no lives. My best friend loves the movies and books and I have sat through the first 2 with her just to be a good friend. But I always tease her about what she will do when I leave. What is it about the actor that plays Edward. He isn't even that hot. I will admit the actor playing Jacob is pretty hot and I do think Kristen Stwart is hot. Just a decent actress. Reply to this
7/7/2010 1:58 PM
Dane wrote:
Sweet review. I could crumble up these movies and maybe make something worth using as a coaster. If I want to see a werewolf movie, I'm go watch the original wolf man movie. Thank you very much. Reply to this
7/7/2010 7:23 PM
Critical Mass wrote:
"Your breasts look nice today?" Do you ever really say that to your wife or is that just something that sounded funny in your head, because if that IS a common thing you say it's no wonder you end up getting kicked out on a regular basis. Hell, it would be a small miracle she married you
In an age where free sex with casual partners is considered normal practice among teenagers, I don't mind when bad fiction acting as propaganda for abstinence is being sold to impressionable young teenagers. Still, I'm glad that my last ex-girlfriend (who was no less a fan of the series than Jillian) didn't follow that advice or I would have been missing out on a lot of fun Reply to this
7/8/2010 5:54 AM
Rebeca wrote:
CS, you almost killed me. NC did a review too, but yours made me laugh the entire time! My stomach hurts You're so right, Charlie is the only really likable character, and Bella the worst of all. They should do movies about the background stories and a sitcom with Charlie as maincharacter.
Unfortunately I still have to wait to see it, as I life in Europe. But I remember the second one. Seriously, I laughed almost during the whole movie, it was so bad and ridiculous! It was so much fun: complete silence in the cinema, only me laughing quietly. Reply to this
7/8/2010 7:37 AM
cynical wrote:
Great review really liked what you did with this one.
7/8/2010 7:15 PM
glenn wrote:
Twilight's message of abstinence is very positive and can be applied to areas of life other than humping each-other silly. Currently, I'm abstaining from being a billionaire. It's brave moral decision on my part. I've made a long term commitment that means penny pinching until I'm in a meaningful relationship with the right bank. Reply to this
7/9/2010 12:07 PM
Invertin wrote:
I'm planning a rewrite of Twilight. Not with the same plot, oh no. In my version, Edward is a proper vampire. As in burns in the sunlight is evil and MUST drink HUMAN blood vampire.
If all goes to plan Bella is hospitalized by the eeeviiilll vampires in the first book and then gets eaten by werewolves in the second. Reply to this
7/9/2010 2:23 PM
Nightwing wrote:
Nice job of not repeating yourself. Twilight is just an example of dreadful writing becoming successful because it's reaching a market that is completely dry. There are no alternatives to Twilight in modern times.... sometimes I wish that the girls of today would go back to reading Shakespeare or Emily Bronte. At least then they wouldn't be raping vampires, werewolves and the English language. Reply to this
7/10/2010 3:13 PM
darknight910 wrote:
You know, I sincerely hope they do make Breaking Dawn, just to see what kind of "review" would happen between the Snob and Jullian. I don't know if she just pretends to be a big fan of the "saga" or not but if the fourth book is made into a movie, with EVERYTHING kept intact, I wanna see the Snob just go nuts, regardless of what his wife thinks and in the end have HER be the one kicked out of the house! XD Reply to this
SERIOUSLY....WHY WASN'T JILLIAN CAST IN THIS SOON TO BE AMAZING EPIC BLOCKBUSTER ??? Reply to this
7/11/2010 10:56 PM
DesertEagle wrote:
Great show, Brad! I loved how you ripped apart this film and described all the various ways it could have been better. The comedic routine with Julein is also priceless.
About the whole abstinence thing. Got to agree with you partially on this one. While people (and teenagers especially) are better off abstaining until marriage for procreation; knowing not everyone is going to be on board with that program due to our brains hardwired for sexual activity teaching safe sex in school is pretty good advise. Reply to this
7/17/2010 10:45 PM
Kryll wrote:
Yes, everyone knows that sex is incredibly evil and dangerous, shameful and something you should only ever do in a controlled environment, such as when you're 35 and married, after having spent your whole youth in a state of torturous sexual repression.
7/12/2010 9:18 AM
AniNerd wrote:
That was a freaking awesome video..I guess that is the common response in here.but It is true at all points.
I really wait for the day when this fucking serie is over,but i guess Steph M could do more Twilight books(And Movies,that WILL follow) And thus dooming us all to the 200.00000 Years of Eternal torture and hell. Reply to this
7/12/2010 8:40 PM
Masamune wrote:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA and thats all i have to say about that. Reply to this
7/15/2010 11:23 PMTheDeviot wrote:
Hey long time lurking fan. Just wanted to say this was one of the funniest sketch styled reviews I think you've ever put out. I fell out of my chair laughing so hard. Especially at the boob comment at the end. Thanks man. I really needed to laugh today. Reply to this
7/22/2010 2:50 AM
LadyKayura wrote:
Thank you for doing a review of this!! You are completely, and 100 percent correct on this,sir. Charlie is the only really great character, and that's mostly because a lot of the secondary characters don't have that much dialogue-driven scenes compared to the terrible trio.
I read the series back when the first Twilight came out to see what the fuss was about. I call it a 'beach read.' Not great literature by a long shot, but the premise is okay when you don't want to have to put all your concentration into what you're reading. Of course, I also refused to call whatever the Cullens and those other creatures have become vampires.
I well and truly wish that Jasper (the Civil War vet) had his own movie or story. A Civil War Major turned into a vampire, discovers he has the ability to feel and control others' emotions, and is used by his maker to command a vampire army battling for feeding territories, killing the vampires who become useless for the battles? SHIT YEAH!!!!
However, if possible, I would wish Stephenie Meyer NOWHERE near the production of either the movie or the book. Reply to this
7/24/2010 8:40 AM
Ben wrote:
No offense to anyone who actually likes this series, but I just think the films are awful. The characters are not interesting or likable,and the story is sub-par at best. Though I do think some parts of the Eclipse film are hilarious. For example, when Jacob kisses Bella without her consent and she punches him in the face, breaking her hand in the process. That is just funny. Reply to this
7/26/2010 2:32 PMBernadineGATES35 wrote:
I opine that to receive the loans from banks you must present a great reason. However, one time I've got a term loan, just because I wanted to buy a house. Reply to this
Unfortunately my page hates donate buttons and the link doesn't work, but if you would like to help out The Cinema Snob (websites is expensive!) my Paypal account is under thecinemasnob@yahoo.com
i totally agree..ive never seen the movies or read the books..but it does have good potential..but it was ruined by fangirls. no offense to your wife though.
Reply to this
Trust me, the book isn't as good as people make it sound. Everything is told to you. descriptions of Edward take up a good chunk of the book. Every character is well developed except the main protagonists Edward and Bella. And the book is loaded with pointless padding that contributes nothing to the plot.
Reply to this
If books and films was food, then the Twilight series would be the nuts in my shit!
Reply to this
You are so nice to your wife
Reply to this
Nice spin on getting kicked out this time. I think this might be my favorite review of Eclipse yet. I was thinking how much better the movie would be if it was about one of the backstories or Charlie monologing about Bella's bullshit.
Reply to this
I've gone on record saying I HATE Twilight before, and as far as I am concerned, the movies are just an abomination made from a series that is a crime against humanity and good taste
Reply to this
I still can't tell if Jillian's joking or not, she's that good of an actor.
Reply to this
Oh, dude, you NEVER talk about their breasts when they're mad at you... also, neat kitties!
Reply to this
Is it me or does Jillian have a little too much fun with these reviews?
Damn fine job as always, and, unfortunately, you're completely spot-on with every single part of your little tirade.
Also, good Lord, your cats are crazy!
Reply to this
It appears one of the kitties has an opinion on the film too.
Reply to this
This movie could have been better if they hadn't put Kristen Stewart as the lead. She is an awful actress, I have to admit. Also, they should have paid more attention to the subplots of the other characters. They are all really interesting, but they just skim over them in the movie. Alice and Jasper's in particular aside from Rosalie's and the rest of the family. I mean, come on: an abused teen locked in an asylum for being able to see the future, a confederate vampire and a rape victim that kills people in her wedding dress? Who wouldn't want to see that?
I guess we'll have to live with the adequate version we were spoon-fed.
PS- I do not imagine the cat is happy about being tossed when he interrupts the shot. Not taken out of it, but she kinda threw him on that last one. They don't always land on their feet.
Reply to this
You must be kidding or not a cat owner. If that hurts your cat, it must be seriously ill.
Reply to this
I own two cats AND I've worked at a veterinary clinic for the last six years. I've seen cats break legs from hopping off the couch. Plus, if they fall from a relatively low distance and are not right way up, they don't always have the time for their instinct to fall on her feet to kick in.
Reply to this
While it is always sad when a cat breaks it's leg, it is at least comforting to know that they will taste great in feline stew. I mean once they break their leg you might as well enjoy them one way or another.
Reply to this
I ran over a cat yesterday is his leg broken? Riah get over you self.
Reply to this
Kristen Steward is a fine enough actor. Not great, just fine. At least from what I saw in her other movies. So either she got an aneurysm while reading the script or there is only so much you can do with this tripe.
Reply to this
She just has no emotional range. And most of time she looks like she's reading the script while doing the scene. I don't know, she just isn't my favorite actor.
Reply to this
Hahaha, the vuvuzela, nice touch.
Reply to this
I Love these twilight reviews I hate the movies but i hope they make another one just so i can see brad do another review
Jarrid needs to get a cot for when the next twilight come out just so brad has a place to sleep lol
Reply to this
Hey brad, Have you seen "LET THE RIGHT ONE IN"? please tell me you have! It is the best Vampire movie ever made and unfortunately it is getting remade in America because Americans are really scarred of subtitles. IT's getting Remade as "LET ME IN". Please watch the original before watching the remake. It is the best vamp movie!
Reply to this
I saw the trailer....I hate shot-for-shot Americanized remakes. And yes, it is a Fantastic Vampire movie.
Reply to this
Can you blame us? How can we pay attention to both the subtitles AND what's going on onscreen?
Reply to this
Did... did you almost rickroll us?
Reply to this
That was "Together Forever". It's Rick Astley's OTHER song that sounds almost exactly the same.
Reply to this
I thought so too! I was considered being annoyed, but frankly it would have been pretty epic, so I'm cool with it.
Reply to this
Well I cant argue with the ending
jillians boobs looked really nice
Reply to this
lol, that was awesome! But I hope you are aware of the fact that your cat totally stole the show ^^
Reply to this
lol, I 100% agree. The best scene in the movie was the bride sequence. I was like "Holy crap this is going to be awesome" then it cuts away and I was like "Nooooooooooo!". These movies make me very emotional for the wrong reasons.
Reply to this
XD Best review ever. I have never been able to get through your reviews when you do them, but this one was really good XD
Everyone loves Charlie, but I think it's because he acts like an actual person both in book and movie. There's even a fan fic called "Edward the Sugar Queen" where he's in fact the main character (course he's gay and in love with Edward but trust me it's way better XD)
Reply to this
That was hilarious. Now I have to go and watch the other two Twilight reviews.
Political side note: Eh, screw it. I'm not getting political here. Review = Funny. Jillian = Good Sport + Funny + Daunting. Pet Kitty = Cute.
Reply to this
Oh that was awesome!
Reply to this
Brad,
Not to worry! My girlfriend went crazy for the Twilight Saga, and I think they're mediocre to crap! Looks like when the two-part finale comes out, we'll both be sleeping on a friend's couch? Oh, is it possible for you to put up the original audio of Jillian's review?
Reply to this
What Rick Astley song was that at the end? Because they all sound like Never Gonna Give You Up, but that one sure wasn't. Was it "Together Forever"?
Reply to this
Great review. I'm kind of wondering now what Jillian was saying the whole time... unless she was made to mime for the whole ten minutes.
I don't think you can take the angst, shirtlessness, or the silly Mary Sue out of Twilight; because that was the point of the story and the appeal of the audience it was made for.
Reply to this
I know people who both hate or love this whole series. I'm right there with saying the background characters are at least ten times more interesting and human like (despite being sometimes not human) then the main characters. The movie should be about them, I don't care about Edward or Bella, they're both annoying and whinny. Frankly, Bella's character makes Dakota Fannings evil little sadistic power look like puppies and unicorns. Bella's a bitch in more ways then just being pretentious and blowing people off. Every character has more heart and ideals then she does, even if they're the fucking evil bad guys. That being said, Jillian is very cool to let you make vids totally bashing the series while she loves it. Funny enough, most Twilight fans don't mind a good parody making fun of it, proving they often know how ridiculous it is at some parts, while still being compelled to like the series due to other factors. Awesome review, totally said absolutely everything about the series with out mindless bashing, pointing out flaws and being someone who "gets it" but still doesn't get why others like it so much.
Reply to this
I can't tell, is Jillian acting or does she really love the movies?
Reply to this
she is acting obviously
Reply to this
I've not watched more than a trailer of any of the movies, but I love Twilight -- solely because it produces gems like this review.
Reply to this
Together Forever. Awesome.
And great review.
Reply to this
nothing says a good review like...LLOYD!!!!
Reply to this
A vuvuzela and the shit that is Twilight in the same review, you have encapsulated this summer brilliantly!
Reply to this
A very entertaining review, even to people who have 0 interest in the movie. I especially liked the vuvuzela joke.
Reply to this
Did You even do a review of the first one?
because I cannot find it on the site
The first one i the only one i saw and I must say I wasnt totally bored because of the hilariously bad dialoge and delivery of it.
anyway, nice review and defnetly watch "let the right one in". There is even a dubbed version, but aside from the two leads its sometimes quite bad voiceacting
Reply to this
I feel bad for that father. I'm surprised he hasn't shot her yet.
Great review.
Reply to this
Hi Brad,
I just wanted to correct you on two things. One, Rosalie Hale was not gang raped in the 1800's, she was raped in the 1930's and one of the rapists was her douchebag fiance at the time. And Jasper acts like he has the rage virus in the first two movies because he feasted on human blood for over a century, so he hasn't fully adjusted to being a vegetarian vampire.
Of course, you probaby don't care. And before anyone decides to flame me, yes, I love Twilight. But I am also a huge Cinema Snob fan and I watched every video back to the bad-lighting days. Hell, I probably know more about Bruno Mattei than I do about Bella Swan!
Overall, I love the ending and love how you dubbed your own opinions over Jillian's dialouge. That alone makes this the best Eclipse review I have seen to date.
Reply to this
Oh my God a vagetarian vampire, Hahahahahaha I can't believe this shit, is this serious? This Stephenie Meyer ever suprises me with something to crack me up. hahahaha I guess that the Vampires actually in the end may be aliens, judging by the new book of this writter. (The Host) hahahaha What drugs are this woman in, really, hahaha OMG.
Reply to this
Abstinent vampires should not be your biggest problem with these books/films, it's not a new or bad concept.
Reply to this
I prefer my Vegetarian Vampires to be named Duckula, Let's get the Cullens a case of Ketchup.
Reply to this
I'm going to risk getting gang raped myself here by siding with you. A lot gets cut between book and movie.
These movies succeed(financially no one can deny that) the way that Last Airbender fails. Too much exposition confused newcomers and annoyed the show's fans. The Twilight movies appeal to the books fan base not newcomers.
I don't really love these movies but I don't walk away from them feeling like I just watched an abstinance psa.
Reply to this
I mean it's not like it's an after school special. Had to browse to find the name of the one that I remember: "Too Soon For Jeff. High school senior finds his future plans turned upside down when his girlfriend tell him she is pregnant."
Brad you should review an after school special. It would be hilarious.
Reply to this
you mean an ASS?
Reply to this
UGH how I HATE the Twilight movies... like hell, I read the books, and I saw the first movie (bootleg YAY I didn't pay for that crap) and it was nothing like the book, not even close! The entire cast (save for Charlie and Carlisle) are complete crap and just AUGH I have no words to describe my hatred for these movies and the stupid fangirls it has created. I'll stick with the Women of the Otherworld series by Kelley Armstrong, k thnx.
Oh, and your wife is such a good sport for playing along with this
Reply to this
Kill Lord Bill made me lol
Reply to this
bzzzzzzzzzzzzz! I love you for that!
Reply to this
I would love to see twilight vampires fight Real Fucking vampires, like the ones from the Blood the last vampire series, that would be fracking awesome, seeing Ciropterian rips Edward's glittery head of and just eat Bella's bitchy white ass , I would pay money to see that ( I am a sick bastard, ain't I?). Also, I would pay money to see a civil war vampire movie.
Reply to this
I liked this review a lot, though that static when you cut her off were really loud.
Reply to this
Brad, mate, you followed the plot details way too closely to make the rant entirely convincing!
Anyway these film related battle of the sexes issues are easily solved. Just nod indulgently, interjecting the occasional "no!" and "then what happened?". Or casually mention that, in this case, Kirsten Stewart is really pretty. Kills any girl film stone dead almost instantly. Of course, the relationship counselling takes months.
Reply to this
hahahaha awesome vuvuzela-action there
Reply to this
Oh no the vuvuzela is everywhere now. Ruuuuuun
Reply to this
Couldn't get past 19 seconds in the video before I vomited all over myself, and had to stop the video before I had a full on seizure.
I spent almost a half hour waiting for the feeling to come back in my right arm, so that I could clean the puke off my floor and off of myself, because of this video.
I hope you're happy.
Reply to this
You know that about 20 seconds in, her audio cuts out and Brad starts trashing the movie over her right?
Reply to this
Watching this makes me wonder how Brad and Jillian get along with each other despite the fact that Jillian likes Twilight while Brad (and 99.9% of males everywhere) hate it
Reply to this
Because different tastes in movies are nothing to end a relationship over. There are other facets to their personalities than simply taste in movies. For instance, her boobs did indeed look nice...so they've got that going on.
Reply to this
funny as hell review, needs more vuvuzela though
Reply to this
The slow, Jaws-like approach of the vuvuzela cracked me up more than anything. Well, that and the cats.
Reply to this
Haha, you two are fucking awesome. Would like to write more, but I'm still trying to breath. Possibly best review EVER!
LOL <- for real! (Ok, kind of, sort of...
Reply to this
Hilarious man.. Truly the best review of it i've seen. I've only seen the series with a Rifftrax and even THAT is painful.. i think Lloyd had a thing or two to say.. the cat steals the show every time. He needs to cameo in about every review.
The Vuvuzela joke was hilarious. as soon and the audio went back to her I thought you may be done.. then slowly the horn comes into the shot and I lost it.
If she owns the movies on DVD i suggest the Rifftrax for them. Actually makes them tolerable and enjoyable.. shocking but true.
But you are dead on with this series. The only likable people are the two Dads.
Edward is a pouty ass. Bella is mentally unstable and a bitch. Jacob is a stalker... and so on.
I hope the next movie is Twilight meets Van Helsing and they all die..
Reply to this
I have no interest in Twilight sorry to all the ladies who like these series. Vampire films can be good bye not making it about sex look at Let the Right one in. Kristin Stewart is not sexy, she in real life is supposed to be really boring and not as pretty as you think. Robert Pattinson is annoying as I cant see what girls see in him, hes a way faced little twerp. The shirtless bloke thing is annoying as hell, if a owman was topless for most of the movie firstly people would moan about objectivacation, second it would not be a pg13. Rant over.
Reply to this
Objectivacation? I'm getting an image of Ayn Rand on the beach writing a travelogue.
Reply to this
I can't believe no one has caught this...Twilight is pretty much Buffy The Vampire Slayer Seasons 1-2
Edward, The Vampire who does nothing Vampirish. Loves the girl that he shouldn't
Angel, The Vampire with a soul does nothing Vampirish until loses soul. Loves the girl that he shouldn't
Both characters have an exact same look
Buffy and Bella both have annoying friends hanging around during high school. Both dealing with the stress of getting through school
The only difference is they throw in some Werewolves and i'm a total dork lmao
Reply to this
Do not insult buffy, the most relative, intriguing, and honest show from the 90s, by comparing it to this tripe... thank you
Reply to this
First off, I hate the idea of Twilight. Vampires don't sparkle! But, just because you can't keep it in your pants doesn't mean others can't. The "primary" function of sex is to reproduce. If you don't have a relationship with someone that you are willing to have a child with then you shouldn't be having sex. And don't bother with comments about condoms. A friend of mine had one break on him and now he has a kid with a stripper who doesn't give a shit about him. My God people, we could literally stop the spread of AIDS today if people learned self control. And you can forget that "test drive" crap too. If you were truly in love with someone would you break up with them because the sex wasn't that great? That's something that can be worked on. What if sex with your wife became impossible due to some illness? Would you cheat on her because it would be "unrealistic" not to have sex? It's amazing how peoples brains stop working when their trying to justify something. I actually heard someone compare it to testing a new food! FOOD? Food doesn't get you pregnant or give you VD's.
And on the religious side (whether you believe in it or not it is a basis for many peoples belief in abstinence) God created sex to be between couples who have made the ultimate commitment to each other. The fact that it is a reproductive act should clue you in to sex being intended for people who are ready to create a family. You are projecting your inability to control yourself on others to make you feel less guilty. I's like an overweight person saying that it is "unrealistic" and "stupid" to eat healthy food.
Reply to this
Your friend didn't know how to use a condom. No question about it. Putting a condom on correctly is part of safe sex. 99.99% effective is not an estimate. These are the ONLY way they break: they're too old (three years or more), they were used against other latex for "double protection" (instead the friction of latex upon latex caused tears), he didn't pinch and hold so there was no room for the ejaculation, he thought he was bigger than he was so the condom slipped, he washed it, reused it, or kept it between the folds of his wallet and/or someplace hot decreasing the effectiveness through wear.
And oh, really abstinence is the way to fix AIDS? You figured it out what social and medical scientists have been writing dissertations on for over 2 decades. Congratulations! Now go tell the people who were infected by their spouses because they thought they were being monogamous that they should have been abstinent with the partners. Or go tell the young girls being sex trafficed that if they don't let men rape them that they will never catch it. OR just tell the girl next door who knows if she doesn't have sex when and how her partner wants it then he'll just find someone else who will. (Sure there's an issue of self esteem there but chances are he will leave) Even then you won't stop sharing needles, or rape in prisons. But I guess you have all the answers.
This movie doesn't even promote real abstinence. Edward and Bella have every meaningful conversation in a bedroom or else laying down together. They're quick to feel each other up, but do not actually talk about the difference and limits between actual penetration and these VERY sexual make out sessions of theirs. If you really believe in abstinence your boyfriend should NOT be sleeping in your bed every night. Let's see how well that works out!
And I'm esp. pissed about your assumption that all overweight people eat unhealthy food. Some people aren't built to be a size 2. There are big people who run everyday, and there are skinny people with type 2 diabetes.
Reply to this
And for those who think the Bible is prudish and uptight about sex, read Song of Solomon!
Reply to this
It should be illegal to teach abstinence in place of safe sex. Abstinence leads to naivety and disease and unwanted pregnancies. Safe sex does not mean go out and fuck anything that moves. It means actually having some smarts about sex, and being able to choose whether or not you want to engage in it or not. And if you choose to do it, then atleast you'll have been taught how to do it safely.
Reply to this
With all due respect, your statement, "Abstinence leads to naivety and disease and unwanted pregnancies", is patently absurd.
Basic biological fact: Abstinence is the only 100% guaranteed way to PREVENT disease and unwanted pregnancies.
Your contention that it somehow leads to "naivety" is equally unfounded.
Young people in 2010 have no shortage of access to info about the mechanics of sex (including every form of contraception--how to use it, etc.).
When it comes to sex, about the only message young folks today AREN'T getting is, "It's OK not to.".
Reply to this
The definition of abstinence certainly doesn't lead to any of that; but when people are taught this, they aren't taught about safe sex. Then you have young people who get caught up in the heat of the moment and who have not been properly taught about how to do it safely. It's abstinent "programs" that I have a problem with. You shouldn't be left to find out about safe sex on your own, you should be taught it. Abstinence programs promote naivety. They do result in unwanted pregnancy and disease, because safe sex is not taught by these programs. This isn't unfounded, it's a proven fact, I've seen it myself; my grade school and high school taught this BS.
Reply to this
An abstinence program, like anything else, can be done well or done poorly.
There is, in fact, a considerable body of evidence that, when implemented properly, abstinence programs can and do achieve successful results.
Anyone interested in investigating this subject further may find the item below to be a good place to start:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2010/02/03/DI2010020302025.html
Reply to this
That's not really true at all. Well, the part about it being the only way to prevent unwanted pregnancies, etc. is true of course, but the idea that abstinence is not promoted as much as anything else to teens is complete bullshit.
Safe sex is hardly taught to teens, and taught correctly with accurate information even less so. Of course the facts are out there, but it isn't what's being shoved in their face all the time.
My wife had a lot of classes in college that dealt with and discussed this subject and she would have a field day with the ridiculousness of your comment.
Reply to this
There was nothing "ridiculous" about my comment.
The larger culture today (including just about any major media outlet you care to name), in innumerable subtle (and not so subtle) ways continually conveys the messages, "Virginity is for losers", "Everybody's doing it.", etc. to young people.
Messages to the contrary are few and far between indeed.
I do not know what was taught in the college classes to which you refer.
But having spent a considerable chunk of my own life on university campuses, I've learned long ago that the difference between what is said and done within the "ivory tower" and the way things are in the real world is, not infrequently, the difference between day and night.
Reply to this
You point out a core flaw with abstinence programs. You assume teens and other young people will listen to you 100%. Simply saying "Don't do it" will be enough. Abstinence programs only serve to blot out the idea of sex entirely, rather then imparting wisdom and knowledge to teens with raging hormones. Remember those years? We all had them and we can all agree we made stupid mistakes during that point in our life.
So I'm with Brad on teaching in depth knowledge on safe sex. Heck, encouraging masturbation would be a step in the right direction cause that comes with 100% protection from pregnancies and VD's. But then again you're going the bible route so that would be another no-no...
Reply to this
Abstinence programs do not simply assume teens will listen "100%", nor do they simply say "Don't do it", etc. (read the item I included in my post above).
And I'm pretty sure the kids have already got the masturbation thing down pat.
Would that the youngsters today had as little difficulty in locating their own country on a map as they do in locating their own zipper.
Reply to this
This is absurd. Nature really, really, really, really, desperately wants you to have sex. It is, functionally, the entire point of being alive -- you live pretty much only so you can reproduce. As a result, there are HUGE biological impetuses to make people go screw and titanic amounts of resources dedicated so species can go get their freak on. These impulses are not easy to ignore, especially when one is a teenager.
Abstinence programs make the bizarre assumption that rebellious, irritated teenagers hopped up on hormones and perhaps other substances will think about sex in a rational, completely non-emotional way. This is absurd on multiple levels.
It's far better to just assume teens will do it regardless of what you say and try to make the best of the cruel hand that hateful bitch Mother Nature has dealt all species with gender by teaching ways to lessen the risks.
It's much easier to go on a diet, after all, than to just stop eating entirely.
Reply to this
Abstinence programs make no such assumption (see the item included in my post above).
Of course, sexual urges are very powerful. No one denies that.
But what is equally undeniable is that such urges are CONTROLLABLE, and the decision to engage in sexual activity is DELAYABLE.
And there is really no connection with eating/going on a diet.
If one does not eat food or drink water, he/she will die.
Not so with one who chooses to delay engaging in sexual activity.
Reply to this
Brad is absolutely right. God forbid that people actually have respect for a teen's ability to make their own decisions. History has shown us that to preach or to legislate any kind of prohibition of anything pleasurable leads to far worse consequences than anything that it was intended to prevent.
Reply to this
There is a reason why a person has to be certain age before they can legally use alcohol or tobacco, drive a car, enter into a legally enforceable contract, etc. (not to mention the very existence and purpose of "age of consent" laws themselves).
When it come to most teens(specifically, ones that are still minors)two facts stand out:
1)They have no real world life experience on which to base any decisions they might make (this is also why, as a parent, it is generally a pointless endeavor to attempt to argue or negotiate with them).
2)Their parents/legal guardians are legally and financially responsible for them. Thus, said youngsters are effectively shielded from most of the consequences of their actions. If they get into a jam, someone else will pull them out of it.
Thus, in and of itself, the notion of "respecting a teen's ability to make their own decisions" (in the sense being discussed here) is, to say the least, a generally unwise proposition.
Abstinence programs are not about "prohibition". At root, they are about instilling self-control (see the item I shared in my post above).
Reply to this
Anonymous, people like you need to just go the fuck away.
Reply to this
Kryll,
So, according to you, people who express disagreement or present an opposing viewpoint need to "go away".
My, what an intelligent, well thought out sentiment.
A true picture of tolerance and open-mindedness.
You must be very proud.
Reply to this
Poor Brad. 'Twilight' cockblocks him again.
Reply to this
Maximum kitty! :3
Reply to this
still bums me out that the guy who made 30 Days of Night directed this. he went from actual scary vampires to......this....ugh.
gotta love the vuvuzela bit or when your cat is all up in the camera all "just what ARE they talking into all the time?"
i was expecting a "I love you???" at the end but talking about her boobs seems more fitting. I'm a girl and i had to think and say "huh he's right."
and at least jerrid doesnt get kicked out of his place lol i can just imagine you too having to sleep outside or something. or at least on that rockin kitchen couch
Reply to this
Awesome review Snob.
All I can say is if I want to see REAL vampires and werewolves ripping each other apart in a massive brawl, I will stick with Underworld: Rise of the Lycans. Thank you very much XD
Reply to this
Has he done reviews of the other Twilight movies and Can someone point me to them if he has?
Reply to this
There is a review for New Moon under the "Movies and TV Reviews" archive but not one for Twilight.
Reply to this
Brad- Ah yes. This was comedy gold. No myself, I've never seen any of the Twilight movies, despite the fact that my sister's daughter want me to see it with them. Yeah right, just as soon as they see Near Dark, Nosferatu, Day Breakers and Blade 1 & 2 (but not 3) with me first. Ha. However, maybe this is just the rock and roll of the young people was we old guys just can't get in to it. My dad was never able to appreciate what Heavy Metal meant to me and I've never been able to sit through any opera with him. Next, I'd like from you more 80's retrospectives. Like Sword and the Sorcerer or this David Caradine fantsy movie that I think is called DeathSport, along with Circle of Iron and the original Death Race 2000 (not the Jason Strathem junk that came later). Or the Richard Lynch made for TV 1979 flick Vampire (even though it's technically the late-70's and the 80's really didn't begin until the introduction of new wave music and styles in 1981 with Thomas Dolby, Kaza Goo Goo, Duran Duran, Flock of Seagulls, Bannana Rama, and other pop icons that will love FOREVER.....ha...
Reply to this
Sword and the Sorcerer, seriously? That movie was. . .not good. Though I heard they're currently making its sequel, due to come out this year or next.
Reply to this
Dude- I don't know what you're talking about. The original S&S was all kinds of awesome! But I did find this so-called sequel on Imbd and watched the trailer online and OMFG was that horrible. I mean, that's a classic example of how CGI can multiply the suck Q of any movie. Thanks for responding. I implore you to give the original another chance....Ha.
Reply to this
Great review Brad...really funny. I liked the bit with the vuvuzela....not terribly original but well performed.
Reply to this
Is there a version of this of the original review of your wift though? I'd really like to hear it even though it will be the same as for movie 2.
Reply to this
Oh my God, getting dragged to see this movie with my best bud by my sister and two of our female work friends was worth it to understand this review. Seriously, there was not one single thing I didn't think of/agree with in this review (the things Brad said anyway). This review along with my first "Ethnic Movie Theater Experience" have proven to fulfill my entertainment dollars spent.
I thank you from the bottom of my soul.
Reply to this
Oh, great job on the review. I never really cared for the books or movies. I've read at least a few pages of the first book and I nearly threw up in my mouth because of it. The books gave me this impression "hey boys and girls its okay to be a complete controlling asshole to your lover. Also, its okay to be emotionless and think its okay go kill yourself." Ack, this whole series is just a complete waste of time, and teaching people the wrong things in my opinion. If the books/movies where more interesting I would care a lot more.
Reply to this
I love this review. Funny, accurate, and wonderful. I hate everything about this series. Both books and movies. I watched the first movie because I like vampires films but it was horrible! I tried to read the books at the urging of some friends, who's literary advice I will never take again. Why is this crap popular? I can't believe that this crap is what's being marketed to young women these days. Bella is a noncharacter. No personality whatsoever. And this is what we're supposed to be identifying with? I'm insulted. I really am.
And yeah, the two leads obviously don't actually want to have anything to do with these piles of garbage. Watch some of thier other stuff, they're not bad actors. In this though. Nothing.
The whole Twilight seires needs more vuvuzela. It would be greatly improved but it.
Reply to this
The only reason why crap like Twilight is popular is because MTV and teen magazines tell young girls that this is what they should like no questions asked. On top of that some of the people who have seen this wretched movies have seen little to none actually good films, if those same people gave something like Interview With The Vampire or even something like Near Dark a chance they would realize how much shit this series is. I completely agree with you on the points you made about this film!
Reply to this
Stephenie Meyer is Mormon, so of course abstinence is going to be a focal point of her romance story. Also, Twilight sucks and Stephenie Meyer and her views are not a good representation of other Mormons. Thanks for your time. Shadowdancer out!
Reply to this
I see a cat!
But I don't think cat is amused by Twilight either.
Reply to this
Follow up to the last comment...I will agree that the side characters are far much more interesting than the main cast. I don't care for Twilight to begin with, but the vampire sibling family have much more interesting bg.
Safe sex is sexy.
Reply to this
Poor Jillian. XD
Reply to this
Well this movie isn't so much as anti-sex as it is anti-sex until after marriage. That's right Edward is a christian vampire. God this movie is dumb.
Reply to this
Kristen Stewart is a decent actress. Just not good enough to play the lead role. I think she is one ofthe main reasons I do not like the movies. She could play a supporting character and it wouldn't be as bad. I am also annoyed at how much the little fan girls lust over Edward, Jacob and even the ones that lust over Bella. It is like Twilight is made just to be masturbation material for teenage girls with no lives. My best friend loves the movies and books and I have sat through the first 2 with her just to be a good friend. But I always tease her about what she will do when I leave. What is it about the actor that plays Edward. He isn't even that hot. I will admit the actor playing Jacob is pretty hot and I do think Kristen Stwart is hot. Just a decent actress.
Reply to this
Sweet review. I could crumble up these movies and maybe make something worth using as a coaster. If I want to see a werewolf movie, I'm go watch the original wolf man movie. Thank you very much.
Reply to this
This was, without a doubt one of your funniest reviews!
Reply to this
great review except FUCKING EAR RAPE!
Reply to this
"Your breasts look nice today?" Do you ever really say that to your wife or is that just something that sounded funny in your head, because if that IS a common thing you say it's no wonder you end up getting kicked out on a regular basis. Hell, it would be a small miracle she married you
In an age where free sex with casual partners is considered normal practice among teenagers, I don't mind when bad fiction acting as propaganda for abstinence is being sold to impressionable young teenagers. Still, I'm glad that my last ex-girlfriend (who was no less a fan of the series than Jillian) didn't follow that advice or I would have been missing out on a lot of fun
Reply to this
CS, you almost killed me. NC did a review too, but yours made me laugh the entire time! My stomach hurts
You're so right, Charlie is the only really likable character, and Bella the worst of all. They should do movies about the background stories and a sitcom with Charlie as maincharacter.
Unfortunately I still have to wait to see it, as I life in Europe. But I remember the second one. Seriously, I laughed almost during the whole movie, it was so bad and ridiculous! It was so much fun: complete silence in the cinema, only me laughing quietly.
Reply to this
Great review really liked what you did with this one.
The vuvuzela part was pretty funny.
Jillian does some fine work.
Reply to this
"Your boobs look really nice today".
Best complement EVAR!!!
Reply to this
blame the snob, brad!!!
Reply to this
Twilight's message of abstinence is very positive and can be applied to areas of life other than humping each-other silly.
Currently, I'm abstaining from being a billionaire. It's brave moral decision on my part. I've made a long term commitment that means penny pinching until I'm in a meaningful relationship with the right bank.
Reply to this
I'm planning a rewrite of Twilight. Not with the same plot, oh no. In my version, Edward is a proper vampire. As in burns in the sunlight is evil and MUST drink HUMAN blood vampire.
If all goes to plan Bella is hospitalized by the eeeviiilll vampires in the first book and then gets eaten by werewolves in the second.
Reply to this
Nice job of not repeating yourself. Twilight is just an example of dreadful writing becoming successful because it's reaching a market that is completely dry. There are no alternatives to Twilight in modern times.... sometimes I wish that the girls of today would go back to reading Shakespeare or Emily Bronte. At least then they wouldn't be raping vampires, werewolves and the English language.
Reply to this
lol was that a vuvuzela?
Reply to this
You know, I sincerely hope they do make Breaking Dawn, just to see what kind of "review" would happen between the Snob and Jullian. I don't know if she just pretends to be a big fan of the "saga" or not but if the fourth book is made into a movie, with EVERYTHING kept intact, I wanna see the Snob just go nuts, regardless of what his wife thinks and in the end have HER be the one kicked out of the house! XD
Reply to this
TWILIGHT FOR GUYS----FUNNY AS HELL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOpyyrtzgBU
SERIOUSLY....WHY WASN'T JILLIAN CAST IN THIS SOON TO BE AMAZING EPIC BLOCKBUSTER ???
Reply to this
Great show, Brad! I loved how you ripped apart this film and described all the various ways it could have been better. The comedic routine with Julein is also priceless.
About the whole abstinence thing. Got to agree with you partially on this one. While people (and teenagers especially) are better off abstaining until marriage for procreation; knowing not everyone is going to be on board with that program due to our brains hardwired for sexual activity teaching safe sex in school is pretty good advise.
Reply to this
Yes, everyone knows that sex is incredibly evil and dangerous, shameful and something you should only ever do in a controlled environment, such as when you're 35 and married, after having spent your whole youth in a state of torturous sexual repression.
...Fuck you.
Reply to this
That was a freaking awesome video..I guess that is the common response in here.but It is true at all points.
I really wait for the day when this fucking serie is over,but i guess Steph M could do more Twilight books(And Movies,that WILL follow) And thus dooming us all to the 200.00000 Years of Eternal torture and hell.
Reply to this
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA and thats all i have to say about that.
Reply to this
Hey long time lurking fan.
Just wanted to say this was one of the funniest sketch styled reviews I think you've ever put out. I fell out of my chair laughing so hard. Especially at the boob comment at the end. Thanks man. I really needed to laugh today.
Reply to this
Holy shit!, I thought that was you in a wig for a second.
Reply to this
TEAM CHARLIE
Hell yah!
Reply to this
Thank you for doing a review of this!! You are completely, and 100 percent correct on this,sir. Charlie is the only really great character, and that's mostly because a lot of the secondary characters don't have that much dialogue-driven scenes compared to the terrible trio.
I read the series back when the first Twilight came out to see what the fuss was about. I call it a 'beach read.' Not great literature by a long shot, but the premise is okay when you don't want to have to put all your concentration into what you're reading. Of course, I also refused to call whatever the Cullens and those other creatures have become vampires.
I well and truly wish that Jasper (the Civil War vet) had his own movie or story. A Civil War Major turned into a vampire, discovers he has the ability to feel and control others' emotions, and is used by his maker to command a vampire army battling for feeding territories, killing the vampires who become useless for the battles? SHIT YEAH!!!!
However, if possible, I would wish Stephenie Meyer NOWHERE near the production of either the movie or the book.
Reply to this
Kirsten Stewart is very good has Joan Jet in the Runaways.
Reply to this
No offense to anyone who actually likes this series, but I just think the films are awful. The characters are not interesting or likable,and the story is sub-par at best. Though I do think some parts of the Eclipse film are hilarious. For example, when Jacob kisses Bella without her consent and she punches him in the face, breaking her hand in the process. That is just funny.
Reply to this
I opine that to receive the loans from banks you must present a great reason. However, one time I've got a term loan, just because I wanted to buy a house.
Reply to this
Though Hermes replica omega adds certain replica TAG elements such as the replica rolex subsidiary seconds dial luxury rolex watches that is a circle within rolex datejust 116234 a square, and the rolex datejust 116234a textured inner rolex datejust 116234b dial. Not to large, the rolex datejust 116234c case is 36.5 x 36.5mm in rolex datejust 116234d size, in steel. Seems like the case has rolex datejust 116234e a nice satin, or rolex datejust 116234g sand-blasted look to it.
Reply to this
Swarovski Earrings
swarovski jewelry
Chanel Earrings
chanel jewelry
pandora jewelry
herve leger dress
Herve Leger
Cheap herve leger
Discount herve leger
herve leger bandage dress
Jimmy Shoes
Jimmy Choo Shoes
Jimmy Choo Sale
Discount Jimmy Choo
Ray Ban Sunglasses
Ray Ban Sale
ray ban aviator
ray ban wayfarer
Discount Ray Ban
Ray Ban 3025
Ray Ban 2140
Reply to this
I like this kind of site that I learned a lot of knowledge, thank you pay ~ sincere thank you!
nfl jerseys
Replica chanel handbags
China wholesale
Nike dunks
Nike sb
Designer Handbags
Replica handbags
Nike dunks
jordan shoes
chanel handbags
nike sb
football jersey
football jerseys
Reply to this
louis vuitton agendas bag or purse. Welcome to browse Louis Vuitton replica Cruise Collection handbag from our fabulous collection of Cruise Collection, these Louis Vuitton knockoff replica Louis Vuitton Agendas Collection are nothing short of excellence. We aim to provide our customers with high quality replica handbags of the latest spring and summer fashion so that they can fully display their glamour in this vigorous season, but with stunningly cheap prices that they would like to pay, and always come back for more. Pleased and satisfied customers are what we desire, and we firmly believe that our first-class service can satisfy all their louis vuitton cruise collection handbag needs.replica louis vuitton handbags cheap louis vuitton handbags discount louis vuitton handbagsluxury handbagwww.moodhandbags.comreplica louis vuitton handbagscheap louis vuitton handbagsdiscount louis vuitton handbagsluxury handbagwww.iv-bag.comThe fashion Louis Vuitton Cruise 2010 Collection bags and purses will bring you the newest fashion wind from the romantic south France.Our Louis Vuitton Damier Canvas is a perfect combination of classics and fashion, a vibrant mix of style and pleasure, offering you exact copies of the original LV handbags, wallets and purses. Those high quality replica Cruise Collection handbags will assure you of a cool and most welcomed change to your style, a change you certainly deserve. Please choose one of those exquisite bags offered in our fabulous louis vuitton damier canvas bag online outlet with fantastic discount. In addition, various other Louis Vuitton knockoffs are waiting for your visitation and selection.
mbt walking shoesmbt shoesdiscount mbt shoes
replica louis vuitton handbags
cheap louis vuitton handbags
discount louis vuitton handbags
Reply to this