Previously featured on YouTube before ultimately being ousted by the powers that be (those powers being the people behind "Nail Gun Massacre") thecinemasnob.com will
feature all of the Snob's videos, old and new, and also brand new shows and full length original movies for those of us who already can't get enough of Z-Grade Cinema.
10/24/2011 8:37 AM
jaltesorensen wrote:
Who dosent like Jerrid? I always think he has such a positive energy in all the radiodrome episodes. Reply to this
10/24/2011 9:29 AM
Lord Flasheart wrote:
Be interesting to know what the comments were. I don't have a prob with Jerrid at all, he certainly does nothing to detract to my enjoyment of he show. if I had a gun to my head and had to make a criticism it would be that he clearly doesn't know as much about a lot of the subjects they discuss as Brad or Josh. Consequently he doesn't have as much to say, which is fine as far as I'm concerned. So it'd be interesting to know if what was said is something similar to that, in which case Josh could be seen as spazzing out a little, Spoony-style. If what was said was just mean for the sake of it then fair enough. "Fuck you" is the appropriate response. Reply to this
10/24/2011 2:52 PM
AniNerd wrote:
Sorry,i just want to say that Even though Jerrid is a bit silent..he just dont want to cut Brad And Josh`s discussing at some movie or actor etc..Also,he doesnt has so Huge Know- How of Movies(And other stuff) that Brad and josh has,so he listens and waits his turn.Still I like His comments,Like his comment At "Women In Danger",where he speculated that Ebert & Siskel Only made the special to Impress And get some "Action". Reply to this
10/24/2011 1:40 PM
Laurel B wrote:
I'm glad Jerrid is there. He makes a good foil (*wince*) for the snarkier personalities present. Reply to this
10/24/2011 2:02 PMJohn Pesina wrote:
"You tell me that a monkey in a diaper wielding a straight razor jumping on the hood of a car isn't the most awesome thing ever."
Holy shit, this is a thing? I really need to see "Creepers" now. Reply to this
10/24/2011 2:42 PM
AniNerd wrote:
New Radiodromes!!! I Had listen to Diffrent Dromes for one week already and i really like This Bunch talking about movies,that some i haven`t heard before,also You can learn something on these. Reply to this
10/25/2011 1:11 AM
UserGoogol wrote:
Octopuses is more or less the most correct pluralization: octopi is based on a false etymology of the word. (Octopus comes from a Greek word, not Latin, so the -us to -i rule doesn't apply.) Reply to this
10/25/2011 1:49 PM
Koneko wrote:
"If you take a dick up the butt, it's porn."
10/29/2011 10:16 AM
tgcam wrote:
the first time i saw Suspiria, i had to watch it in Italian with no subtitles. I thoroughly enjoyed the film anyway, and if i did get a copy of it it it would have to have the Italian language option. Reply to this
11/3/2011 7:14 PM
nathan wrote:
guys seriously!!! how the fuck can you talk about dario argento and goblins in the same video and not even metion Suspiria!!!! that movie is fucking genius!!! his best work by far!! (yes its better than deep red, i said it) Reply to this
1/20/2012 3:57 AM
Handsome Pete wrote:
The made-up ratings system that really gets me, because people decided to just roll with it after a while, is when movies get zero stars or whatever-and-a-half stars. Those drawings of half stars are so stupid looking, and drawing zero stars isn't even possible. And of course it totally misses the point. Stars aren't supposed to be accurate, like a percent. They're used because they're quick and easy, and because they can convey qualities as well as qualities. I remember for a while there was a kind of unspoken code, with one star meaning pain-inflicting, two stars meaning weird, three stars meaning dumb fun, four stars meaning Oscar bait, and five stars meaning a blockbuster. Plus, there was an implied compliment to getting rated at all, since you had to reach a certain level of distribution to even get the one star. Reply to this
Unfortunately my page hates donate buttons and the link doesn't work, but if you would like to help out The Cinema Snob, my Paypal account is under thecinemasnob@yahoo.com
Who dosent like Jerrid? I always think he has such a positive energy in all the radiodrome episodes.
Reply to this
Be interesting to know what the comments were. I don't have a prob with Jerrid at all, he certainly does nothing to detract to my enjoyment of he show. if I had a gun to my head and had to make a criticism it would be that he clearly doesn't know as much about a lot of the subjects they discuss as Brad or Josh. Consequently he doesn't have as much to say, which is fine as far as I'm concerned. So it'd be interesting to know if what was said is something similar to that, in which case Josh could be seen as spazzing out a little, Spoony-style. If what was said was just mean for the sake of it then fair enough. "Fuck you" is the appropriate response.
Reply to this
Sorry,i just want to say that Even though Jerrid is a bit silent..he just dont want to cut Brad And Josh`s discussing at some movie or actor etc..Also,he doesnt has so Huge Know- How of Movies(And other stuff) that Brad and josh has,so he listens and waits his turn.Still I like His comments,Like his comment At "Women In Danger",where he speculated that Ebert & Siskel Only made the special to Impress And get some "Action".
Reply to this
Just one point: Jesus "Jess" Franco wasn't Italian but Spanish...
Reply to this
Brad mentioned he was Spanish.
Reply to this
I'm glad Jerrid is there. He makes a good foil (*wince*) for the snarkier personalities present.
Reply to this
"You tell me that a monkey in a diaper wielding a straight razor jumping on the hood of a car isn't the most awesome thing ever."
Holy shit, this is a thing? I really need to see "Creepers" now.
Reply to this
New Radiodromes!!! I Had listen to Diffrent Dromes for one week already and i really like This Bunch talking about movies,that some i haven`t heard before,also You can learn something on these.
Reply to this
Octopuses is more or less the most correct pluralization: octopi is based on a false etymology of the word. (Octopus comes from a Greek word, not Latin, so the -us to -i rule doesn't apply.)
Reply to this
"If you take a dick up the butt, it's porn."
So Requiem for a Dream is porn?
Reply to this
Someone out there is busting on my Jerrid??? Oh, it's ON now!!!
Reply to this
the first time i saw Suspiria, i had to watch it in Italian with no subtitles. I thoroughly enjoyed the film anyway, and if i did get a copy of it it it would have to have the Italian language option.
Reply to this
guys seriously!!! how the fuck can you talk about dario argento and goblins in the same video and not even metion Suspiria!!!! that movie is fucking genius!!! his best work by far!! (yes its better than deep red, i said it)
Reply to this
The made-up ratings system that really gets me, because people decided to just roll with it after a while, is when movies get zero stars or whatever-and-a-half stars. Those drawings of half stars are so stupid looking, and drawing zero stars isn't even possible. And of course it totally misses the point. Stars aren't supposed to be accurate, like a percent. They're used because they're quick and easy, and because they can convey qualities as well as qualities. I remember for a while there was a kind of unspoken code, with one star meaning pain-inflicting, two stars meaning weird, three stars meaning dumb fun, four stars meaning Oscar bait, and five stars meaning a blockbuster. Plus, there was an implied compliment to getting rated at all, since you had to reach a certain level of distribution to even get the one star.
Reply to this