To Boldly Flee, Part 2
On a long distance train trip, a man finds romance, but also witness a dead man being thrown from the train. When no one believes him, he attempts to solve the mystery himself with the help of a wise cracking car thief.
DVD's
Blip TV
Original Series
Paranoia
Welcome
Previously featured on YouTube before ultimately being ousted by the powers that be (those powers being the people behind "Nail Gun Massacre") thecinemasnob.com will
feature all of the Snob's videos, old and new, and also brand new shows and full length original movies for those of us who already can't get enough of Z-Grade Cinema.
Links
Mike Bracken
The Spoony One
Tenebrous Kate
Eccentric Cinema
ThatGuyWithTheGlasses
Pushing Up Roses
Cinemassacre
The Geek Den
Revolving Video
Shaun Millington
Shriek Freak Arrow in the Head
Leslie Jones Blastoff Network
I Spit on Your Taste
Vault of Horror
Bloody Disgusting
Varied Celluloid
Patrick Rodriguez
Avante Garde Theatre
DjDaymage Halloween Mix
Cheap Arse Film Review
Forgotten Junk
Banned From the Video Store
The Experience Cinematic
Fistful of Cult
Video Hero's Hollywood Rant
The Horror Channel
Full Moon Reviews
SFHFF Review
The Spoony One
Tenebrous Kate
Eccentric Cinema
ThatGuyWithTheGlasses
Pushing Up Roses
Cinemassacre
The Geek Den
Revolving Video
Shaun Millington
Shriek Freak Arrow in the Head
Leslie Jones Blastoff Network
I Spit on Your Taste
Vault of Horror
Bloody Disgusting
Varied Celluloid
Patrick Rodriguez
Avante Garde Theatre
DjDaymage Halloween Mix
Cheap Arse Film Review
Forgotten Junk
Banned From the Video Store
The Experience Cinematic
Fistful of Cult
Video Hero's Hollywood Rant
The Horror Channel
Full Moon Reviews
SFHFF Review
The Cinema Snob: To Boldly Flee, Part 2
Support
Help Support The Cinema Snob!
Unfortunately my page hates donate buttons and the link doesn't work, but if you would like to help out The Cinema Snob, my Paypal account is under thecinemasnob@yahoo.com
Unfortunately my page hates donate buttons and the link doesn't work, but if you would like to help out The Cinema Snob, my Paypal account is under thecinemasnob@yahoo.com
Knock knock. Who's there? Hell. Hell who? HELL YEAH FUCKING TO BOLDLY FLEE, PART 2 IS UP!!
Reply to this
Fuck that shit, I'm just here for the video description!
Reply to this
Great use for Giallo Plot Generator
Reply to this
Except it actually sounds like a plot summary for the Gene Wilder film "The Silver Streak"
Reply to this
Let the trashing commence.
Brad doesnt look like he's enjoying himself.
Brad is the best.
Brad is the funniest.
Brad doesn't want to be there.
I came here for Brad.
I hate TGWTG.
Comments about being gay, etc.
Think I covered everything.
Reply to this
You forgot to add: "explain yourself. you owe a personal explanation as to why you didn't like it." Or, "you have to like it, it's free."
Reply to this
Too slow, I win.
Reply to this
Nope, you missed the fact that I was right about the Internet policy asshole being a ripoff of William Atherton's "EPA guy" asshole.
Despite the ripoffs, this is a semi-decent film.
For one made by internet persona critics.
Released free to the Internet.
Reply to this
I don't know who most of these people are
Brad is under-used
TGWTG fans are creepy weirdos
When is the next Cinemasnob
Reply to this
I'd rather watch the GOP convention than this. Hear that? You make me want to watch a group of old homophobes over this movie.
Reply to this
Enjoy then
Reply to this
The suckiest thing that has ever sucked!-(And that`s a REAL popcultural reference...)
Reply to this
Because...?
Reply to this
Funny how you don't ask people who just simply write "this is awesome" to elaborate on what they say.
Reply to this
Bull fucking shit. I would ask "because" if someone said that this was the greatest creation ever to have been created. There's a difference between saying stupid shit like what the guy replied to, and just saying something is 'bad' or is 'awesome.'
Reply to this
Fuck. You guys all talkin shit about my man Doug? Go ahead, go ahead. I'll just sit here, and then when I'm done, I'm gonna skull fuck ya. Oh god? Oh no...Oh YEAH!!
Knock knock. Who's there? Fuck. Fuck who? FUCK YOU! Fuckin elitist cunts. Talkin shit about Doug. You don't know what the fuck you're fuckin talkin about mother fuckers.
This shit is fierce, man, it's fierce! That's why we go to the movies! To see something fuckin fierce and dark! Fuckin raggin on Doug, let me tell you something. I haven't stopped quoting this movie since I saw the first episode Thursday night.
Just the other day, I walked up to my friend, and I quoted my favorite fucking line from the movie, I was like "hey man , 'fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck'!" And he was all like "YOU SAW TO BOLDLY FLEE TOO, THAT MOVIE WAS THE FUCKING MAN!!"
Fuckin tellin me that Doug can't write, fuck you!
Reply to this
Well Doug has a better grasp on language than you at least. Seriously, if you're going to attempt sarcasm at least have a talent for it.
Reply to this
And if you say fuck one more time you'll have said fuck 19 times in your fucked up rhyme.
Reply to this
I heard that shit makes your balls funny Brucie
Reply to this
Niko, Do I look like I have "funny balls" to you? :p
Reply to this
Nice use of the Zombwonder there.
Reply to this
I fucking knew that sounded familiar!! God bless Foy.
Reply to this
copypasta saved.
Reply to this
Fucking Ghostbusters reference.. I love you guys..
Reply to this
That was fantastic. I lost my shit when the music kicked in.
Reply to this
I'm counting down the minutes until the inevitable Faggot Josh cameo.
Reply to this
What is wrong with you people? If you don't like it, fine. Then don't watch it. At the same time; didn't your mothers ever teach you if you don't have something nice to say, don't say anything at all?
LOTS of people worked very hard on this movie. You don't have to like it, but don't trash it just to act cool, like you're some stupid hipster apple cultist.
(p.s. I can be hypocritical about you jerks because I don't care about you.)
Reply to this
I totally agree. Only put positive comments in here!
Reply to this
"Oh no! They said nasty things about this! that can't possibly be, we all agreed on only hating this I hate"
One thing is disagreeing with other peoples opinion, but saying that other's opinion is not allowed is really fucking retarded, yes more so than the comments you imagined you were replying to.
Even "it sucks, do something else" is better feedback than not saying ANYTHING just because someone may not agree.
Reply to this
Answer me this: Which is more retarted?
Calling out a bunch of hipster douchecocks for being hipster douchecocks? Or watching the first part, bitching about how much you thought it sucked, and then WATCHING THE SECOND PART and repeating that you think it sucks?
Pretty sure I'm a fucking genius compared to you morons.
Reply to this
No. You're a jerk who thinks people don't have a right to express things that dislike about something or - gasp, shock, horror! - finish watching something they've started out of a desire to see A.) if it improves and B.) How it ends. You're being an asshole because a few people have had fairly reasonable criticisms. That's not being a fucking genius compared to anybody. It's being a prick.
Reply to this
Your lips are flapping but I just can't hear what you're saying.
(Now I'm being a jerk.)
Reply to this
You're telling people not to express their opinion, which most have done politely and without being dicks, on the basis of "if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all." Do you realize the irony of such a thing when we're posting in the comments section of a man who makes his living on criticism? Virtually nobody is "trashing it to be cool" to paraphrase you. Most people are expressing something they disliked in a professional and acceptable manner. Perhaps, my friend, it is you who is being a blind, hateful sycophant who refuses to acknowledge that some people are going to feel different about things than you do.
Reply to this
Every negative comment about the movie that I have seen on this part and the first part have ALL been in a douchebag hipster tone.
Reply to this
That's either a flat out lie, or you haven't actually been reading the comments.
Reply to this
Some people in the past specials have made comments which have been basically attacks on the people who put the time and effort to create this special though and I don't think that's cool. I mean, if you have problems with the plot or the pacing then by all means express your opinion (including that reason), yet if you're just going to be hateful to the people who made this, then don't comment at all. It's not constructive dialogue.
Reply to this
doug is a gaylor
Reply to this
Upset Prick saying exactly the same word The Man without Dick from Ghostbuster said(of course it is the point but it just wasn't that funny). It was pretty funny part. Also *spoiler alert* Pricks gets killed by 8-Bit Mickey so yeah win and the Plot hole as the force that destroy everything is pretty funny idea.
Reply to this
I wonder if Brad's episode descriptions are just made up off the top of his head or if they're actually the synopses of some long aborted scripts of his.
Either way they make me chuckle.
Reply to this
Neither, they are actual blurbs from actual movies, Captain Ignoramus.
Reply to this
Well colour me black-faced!
What movies are they attributed to may I ask?
Reply to this
So far, Mr. Mom and Silver Streak
Reply to this
Silver Streak! The other description Linkara made, I have no idea what comic is that.
Wonder what took so long to release part 2? I thought each part is supposed to be released daily.
Reply to this
Nope. Every 3 days. As was actually said by the publishers.
Reply to this
Oh that's good! I just got done watching Kickassia again, so I'll watch Suburban Knights again on Tuesday. Then after that, I'll get around to watching the first two parts of To Boldly Flee. Watching a TGWTG movie with everybody in it is an endurance, but always worth it!
Reply to this
I had to be a bit more sneaky with the description for this one without giving it away, but there's a word or two that reveals it if you're not familiar with the comic. ^_^
Reply to this
I'm no comic book nerd, so I let somebody figure it out for me. Funny thing, I always thought that Starman was a 1980's sci-fi drama starring Jeff Bridges and Karen Allen.
Reply to this
It's that, too, but Starman has been around since the Golden Age and has had at least four or five different versions running around. The one I was referencing was the most popular version.
Reply to this
Ok folks. If you a bitching about this one then it is your own damn fault. You didn't like part one so why the hell did you watch part two? As for my thoughts, I laughed at this one. It was really good.
Reply to this
What does it make you if you haven't watched part one OR part two? Roger Ebert?
Reply to this
Because you're not allowed to have enjoyed part one but not this one...? Your argument is flawed.
Reply to this
No. Not at all, you can have liked part one and not liked part two, but if you are the same tool that didn't like the first one then why are you watching part two? Are you doing it for a reason other than to bitch and whine? Or are you just whining cause you think people give a damn that you are whiny? If you don't like it at this point, cool. I don't to see you back for part three... unless you are just a giant, trolling douche bag. Then welcome back!
Reply to this
Um...I actually really enjoyed part 1. So maybe you should take your head out of your ass and stop trying to dictate to people what they can and cannot do. Especially in regards to watching something on the internet. It's perfectly acceptable to watch something, dislike it, and talk about what your problems with it were. If it wasn't Brad would get ripped to shreds constantly about the midnight movie screenings, etc. It's also perfectly acceptable to have disliked a part of a larger whole but been curious enough to continue watching because you want to see where it goes and how it ends. Criticism, when reasonable and politely expressed, is not trolling. Calling someone a troll because their opinion is different than yours on the other hand is precariously close to trolling in and of itself.
Reply to this
I swear to god, you people aughta, just...pfft, fuckin dicklickers all of you. Let me tell you something right now. What you don't understand is the genius of Doug Walker!
This isn't like that boring ass shit that Spielberg does. Doug actually gets into the mind of these critics!! It's like a funny psychological thriller, like Hitchcock. But you assholes don't appreciate it, nor do you understand it, because you all suckle at the teet of Spielberg!
It's just fucking disgusting. The hot dog scene. That means...that the critics are angry! Get it now? They are all alone, they are without their families, they have bad childhoods. And that pisses them off even further!
Reply to this
How dare we to disagree with you?! Its not like the unwashed masses at TGWGT have been giving enough praise on their very site. You seriously delude yourself if you think this is some deep and profound work. We are trying to be the critics this time around and like Brad once said "If this movie gets nitpicked to shit, it fucking deserves it". And for the record, we won't suck Doug Walker's dick on this one.
Reply to this
I think you may have missed a LOT of sarcasm in Benben's post.
Reply to this
Hmm, that went south fast... I mostly liked the first episode, a big improvement over the last couple of anniversary movies. It was watchable and for the most time, it was fun. But this episode seemed kind of off, like the "say whaat?" joke in the beginning, more cringe worthy than enjoyable imo.
A small handful of funny jokes though, not all bad. Less optimistic about the rest now, but i guess it could go either way at the moment.
Reply to this
I do enjoy reference humor...but out right stealing a full sequence straight out of ghostbusters? I don't think I can get behind that. It just seems kind of lazy...and worst of all, felt like nothing but a method to get in some cameos. This has been by far the best of the anniversary specials, but the amount of outright theft of scenes and ideas for the sake of humor is something I really don't like.
Reply to this
another problem with such full referencing is that someone who hasn't seen it will absolutely not get it, because doing an entire bit doesn't require giving it context (unlike taking 1/10 of something and having the other 9/10 filled by either knowing the reference... or seeing what is done in the current project)
It's pretty much why Brad's fucking awesome - I get a only small amount of his references - but the way he sells them and relates them to the reviewable material let's me get what he was going for... and hell, even learn about what he's referencing
Reply to this
I don´t like it when a reference is there just for the saking of referencing. Like the introscene with Paw, taken shot for shot from the intro of Contact. But there´s no joke or anything, it´s just "hey look, we saw contact!, remember that movie?".
I´m not sure i get it, personally i would rather see what the Walkers could think up, i already saw contact, and it was better, presented filmed and better acted than what was offered here. Guess its just a matter of taste, some people seem to love all these small "tributes/rip-offs/parodies(not really?)" or whatever you can call them.
Reply to this
You know there's another group of guys who's idea of humor is just throwing references in.
Jason Seltzer and Aaron Friedberg.
Look all I'm saying is that Doug and Rob are the indie Seltzerberg there's no denying it now, not after they made Vampire's sucks without realizing the irony of mocking a shitty franchise.
Though some of the pro-Doug Walker folks make compelling arguments. Doug's films are pretty fucking brutal man.
Reply to this
Don't know what's with all the douchebags here, if you don't like it fine, I didn't like Suburban Knights, but I found a way to not be a dick about it in the comments section, fucking relax you assholes. Or maybe here's an idea watch something else if your not likeing this.
I personally find this funny, not laugh out loud funny, but subtle and enjoyable
Reply to this
Actually the biggest douchebag here is the guy who liked it.
Reply to this
Douchebag? You callin me a douchebag? First of all, this is why you guys are nuthin but a bunch of fuckin panzies. Douchebag? You can't come up with something better?
Doug would be all like "you're just a fuckin cunt lickin mother fuckin fuckin blah blah" FUCK YOU! That's your best comeback? A douchebag?
Here's why I hang out over at the board over on Linkara's site. Cause they're not like you cunts. Fuckin thing you're better than everyone else. You're all like "oh yeah, give me a japanese movie with subtitles and I'll have an erection for a week."
But Doug Walker, he makes a brutal fuckin movie. BRUTAL. Brutally fucking funny. This isn't like tat fuckin E.T. crap. This isn't like that. Some rubber suited alien with big eyes, fuck that. Doug Walker fucking kills people. He kills. He's a real person, and he kills you and stomps your head in with his awesome humor.
Reply to this
First of all I wasn't calling you a douchbag, if you are responding to my comment then I couldn't be calling you a douchebag. That being said reading your comment in reply to mine your are douchebag. You then tell me I couldn't come up with anything better, well that's because your a douchebag, and that's the appropriate term for one acting douchebag like. I don't have to come up with anythhing "better" I just came up with the appropriate term. Maybe I should have said what you said "fucking fuck FUCK YOU fuck, THAT'S YOUR BEST COMEBACK, even though this is your comment and it can't be a comeback to anything fuckity fuck fucking E.T crap fuck"
furthermore I am not saying I am better then someone I'm just not an ass about something I don't like, if I don't like it whatever, I move on.
Then I read your third paragraph and realized your just looking for a fight, and your looking for attention, and I'm giving it to you SAUCYPANTS OUT.
Reply to this
First of all I wasn't calling you a douchbag, if you are responding to my comment then I couldn't be calling you a douchebag. That being said reading your comment in reply to mine your are douchebag. You then tell me I couldn't come up with anything better, well that's because your a douchebag, and that's the appropriate term for one acting douchebag like. I don't have to come up with anythhing "better" I just came up with the appropriate term. Maybe I should have said what you said "fucking fuck FUCK YOU fuck, THAT'S YOUR BEST COMEBACK, even though this is your comment and it can't be a comeback to anything fuckity fuck fucking E.T crap fuck"
furthermore I am not saying I am better then someone I'm just not an ass about something I don't like, if I don't like it whatever, I move on.
Then I read your third paragraph and realized your just looking for a fight, and your looking for attention, and I'm giving it to you SAUCYPANTS OUT.
Reply to this
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.
Reply to this
Ugh, just saw this idiotic shit over on Youtube....copy/paste something new you idiot, it got old 5 seconds after it was first done.
Reply to this
Yeah? Well go ahead and get my IP too, because I just cant wait to see how full of shit YOU are. If you had all that stature, you wouldnt be flaunting it, and honestly, its just sad to see such a dick swinging braggart fest. Take your insecure, empty threats somewhere else. Maybe FoxNews has a comments page somewhere where youll feel right at home
Reply to this
You are absolutely correct if you like something that someone else doesn't that makes you a douchebag...wait what?
Reply to this
Funny how everyone in this thread assumes that people complain and act like dicks, when no one has complained or acted like dicks yet (Except for the ones complaining that people act like dicks)... :p
Reply to this
It's not being a douchebag to express dislike of something, or, God forbid, provide reasonable criticism.
Reply to this
Not bad. Slightly better than the first. #FaggotJosh
Reply to this
I really do love these anniversary specials, but this one wasn't AS good as episode one. Not their fault, really, it's a "bridge" episode, so they had to put a lot of stuff together. I thought the teleporter bit was a little lazy, but I guess they did explain it. Could've been better, but could've been much, much worse as well.
As for people complaining about it... Well, it IS their right to do so, and God forbid I keep you from speaking your minds. And I suppose the "if you know you won't like it, don't watch it" argument is a tad flimsy considering the people they're criticizing.
So I guess I'm saying that while you have every right to your opinion, if you'd like it to be respected, just make sure you can back it up.
Although I do find it funny that so far we have more people complaining about people complaining than we do people actually complaining.
Reply to this
the teleporter stuff was hilarious, im mean, if this was a more serious movie maybe, but the line ¨i stole it¨ from Doug was crazy funny
Reply to this
I like how there are now more comments about people being mad at people criticising this then are actual criticisms. Good job trolls!
Reply to this
Well I like it so far.
Reply to this
This is as much a movie as "sxkgejklbge" is a word.
Reply to this
sxkgejklbge - (n) Someone who thinks that a mini-series is a movie.
Reply to this
For me, this was BIG improvement over the first part. I was actually laughing quite a bit here. As I figured, once they got the rhythm and pacing up, things would start to click. I loved the timing between Brad & Sage, and Sad Panda's little sly bit with Dr. Insano was funny. I'm glad they outright addressed the fact that in Kickassia, Spoony & Insano were the same guy, but not here and why. I genuinely think Noah did an amazing job in all three roles here. Nice appearance by Ed Glaser, too.
I've gotta LOVE that Brad essentially played the Bill Murray role in the "GhostBusters" Walter Peck scene.
Reply to this
I liked it. Spoony, Brad, and Doug of course stole the show again. I expected that.
Also, yay Ghostbusters scenes.
Can't wait til the next part.
Ignore the haters!
Reply to this
Ok, cringeworthy blatant ripoff Ghostbusters parody in the beginning of the second part aside, this was pretty damn entertaining. I just hope we can avoid more of those "parodies/homeages" that are that blatant.
Reply to this
Yeah. I try not to be too harsh, and I said in another comment I do enjoy reference humor, but the outright ripping off for no reason whatsoever other than to get cameos into the special was just too much. I'm a fan, but that's not a "parody" or an "homage" that's borderline plagiarism.
Reply to this
Not as good as Part 1 in terms of actual story plot but the jokes were funnier.
What kills me though are the above comments. Can you imagine if this was an actual movie in cinemas? How many people would watch and enjoy it? If this was a real movie, all in one piece then I think the critics would hate it.
Special effects looked alright, nothing spectacular.
Reply to this
That really is the problem with these anniversary specials, if you don´t know the people involved and the context, you´re not going to get half of the jokes. You really have to forgive a lot of issues to truly enjoy these specials, which is easier if you´re a fan of spoony/brad/doug or whoever.
Reply to this
"That really is the problem with these anniversary specials, if you don´t know the people involved and the context, you´re not going to get half of the jokes."
I agree and disagree. I agree that not many people who don't know of TGWTG will understand the jokes. I mean, if a person never saw "Suburban Knights" or a "Nostalgia Critic Review" then they won't probably understand the material. I disagree in saying that's bad though. The first time I ever saw any TGWTG material was back in 2010 when my friend told me about this crazy internet movie called "Kickassia". I, at first, didn't understand anything that was going on, yet that just motivated me to put the time to understand the characters. I've seen every TGWTG review for the past 2 years so that now I can understand what is going on. I can understand that the reason why the Ghostbusters sequence was placed in the movie was to include the reviewers that could not physically make it to the "To Boldly Flee" special. I thought that was funny since it was a call back to Welshy, Kyle's, and Diamanda Hagan's commentary of "Suburban Knights".
"Oh god, these things are getting worse and worse. I mean was the script written by a drunk 4 year old?
I watched part 1, and fucking hated it, but this part made me want nail my scrotum to my desk so I would be distracted from the mind fuck.
Seriously, who the fuck likes this shit?" A fan who respects and enjoys the material presented by all the TGWTG reviewers would like this. Please don't be a dick, Fraser. You don't want to break the Great Wil Wheaton's Number One Rule of the Internet.
Reply to this
Man, Brad makes me laught the most, but Lupa got the best line here and in part 1.
Nostalgia Chick is very underplayed.
but i was really happy to see JO.
i thing the reason im enyoing this so much is because im familiar with most of the people (being Brad, Doug, Spoony, JO, NC and a couple more)
can´t wait to see Oanciticen
Reply to this
But you've already seen Oancitizen. Brad's been in the first 2 parts!
Reply to this
Shhhhhhhh!!!!!!!! Quiet, you'll suddenly summon the almighty thin skinned Kallgren...we all can agree we really don't that. I'm sure he's whining about that comment right now on his twitter. Cry, faggot, cry.
Reply to this
Oh god, these things are getting worse and worse. I mean was the script written by a drunk 4 year old?
I watched part 1, and fucking hated it, but this part made me want nail my scrotum to my desk so I would be distracted from the mind fuck.
Seriously, who the fuck likes this shit?
Reply to this
A fan who respects and enjoys the material presented by all the TGWTG reviewers would like this. Please don't be a dick, Fraser. You don't want to break the Great Wil Wheaton's Number One Rule of the Internet.
Reply to this
My post was pure sarcasm, I actually enjoyed both parts.
Reply to this
I can't detect sarcasm on the internet, Fraser. I'm truly sorry. I thought you were being absolutely serious. I mean, the Suburban Knights comment sections had many comments that were similar to yours, yet they were serious as hell, man. Again, I'm sorry! If you ever meet me in person you can totally punch me in the face and steal my money!
Reply to this
That's the plot to Silver Streak, right? I haven't seen that movie in forever.
Reply to this
What's the name of the movie from the description?
Reply to this
If that movie doesn't exist, Brad and company should make it. I see Jake as the wise cracking car thief!
Reply to this
The movie is called Silver Streak, it's a buddy comedy starring Gene Wilder and Richard Pryor, one of the duo's best.
And dammit Brad, now I have to go track down a copy of Silver Streak so I can watch it.
Reply to this
So far the best anniversery movie. This was better than the first part, had some good lines and jokes but the whole ghostbusters bit was very Freidburg-Seltzerish. Which is bad.
Reply to this
I love how people can speak their minds here without getting flagged, banned or deleted like in TGWTG.com. Keep up, people. Your negative criticism will keep them straight.
Reply to this
Alot of the critics and there fans can't handle negative feedback. Oh the irony
Reply to this
I'm not here for the hate,I'd say peace and love; precisely, I admit I would happily do some intense loving to sweet elisa Hansen there.
Reply to this
The movie the video description is referencing?
Reply to this
Wuxi City Public Security Bureau Zhao Zhixin said that The arrest of drug suspect case of violence impedance
May 15
this the suspects were under criminal detention, custody send Wuxi City Detention Center.
: similar to the situation a 3 man first went to Jiangyin and then went to Nantong Haimen, last on June 17 have been arrested.
,chaussure de foot,, Xishan Port police station four police and two people Auxiliary Police to Huishan Luoshe arrest drug trafficking suspects Huang Feilong. Huang Feilong and other violence to hinder the performance of official duties in the arrest process, four people the police were injured. Assaulting a police officer after seven suspects quickly fled,michael kors, 17, Huang Feilong such as the four main suspects have arrest and criminal detention according to law. Police are looking for three people involved, and at the same time 'investigating Huangfei Long suspected of drug trafficking case.
5 month 14 day and night to the early morning of the 15th the Xishan Hong Kong under the police station in Hong Kong under YANGJIAN other places and arrested 10 drug suspects. In the review, a drug addicts accountable,mercurial vapor pas cher, many times together with Huang Feilong and other people in the Huishan Luoshe Huangfei Long's, the temporary residence methamphetamine, also said Huangfei Long suspected of drug trafficking. On the afternoon of May 15,chaussure de foot pas cher, Hong Kong under the police station four police and two auxiliary police plainclothes to the Luo community to arrest Huang Feilong. After the external investigation, Huang Feilong not temporarily staying,www.michaelkorsoutletofficialeshop.com, and then the police waiting in a nearby ambush. Around 7:00 that night,louboutin, Huang Feilong and his brother and two other men drove Luoshe the Tianqi City Guangdong Harbour door, the police then stepped forward to arrest Huang Feilong.
in the arrest process, such as police and Huang Feilong conflict, the identity of the police Liang Ming police, but Huang Feilong shouting: kitchen knives, scissors and other weapons taken from the surrounding shops, also found with three other suspects hit the police. Arrest the police side and seven suspects to start fighting while calling 110 to request reinforc
Reply to this
Thank you, Chinese gibberish robot!
May your programmer have turtle-eggs for children!
Reply to this
This show is no "Cheers." Just sayin, "Cheers" was a way better show than this. "Cheers" is awesome.
Reply to this
Fuck all you. You know what the best part of To Boldly Flee was? You know what the best part was? It was Doug Walker FUCKIN SHIT UP MAN! CAUSE THAT'S WHY WE GO TO THE MOVIES!! TO SEE SHIT GET FUCKED UP AND HOPEFULLY SOME TITTIES!!
Reply to this
Go suck his dick in his site them. And fuck you for not giving proper respect to Brad.
Reply to this
You can't fly a house into space like that. It would fucking burn up.
Reply to this
Of course it can, they threw a metric crapton of technobabble in it. Everything is possible with SCIENCE!
That, or they used magic, so they don't have to explain it.
Reply to this
I think the thing that got the biggest laugh out of me was where everybody was stealling Insano`s stuff while he wasn`t looking.
Reply to this
I want this on beta.
Reply to this
Wow, so much trolling in the comments. I really hope most of the people commenting are (how could I put it?) young adults. It would be really sad if people in their 20's are writing comments like this.
Come on guys. If you don't like it, be constructive about it. Trolling doesn't achieve anything, and getting pissed at some guy who has a different opinion from you just throws fuel on the fire.
I would hope that by now people are receptive this kind of common sense but I think the young viewership tends to skew this. I'll take a look at part 2 a little later (Watching Scorsese's After Hours for the moment) and will critique if necessary.
Reply to this
Funny. I liked it.
Reply to this
Came here to watch the comments, not the movie. Even brought a snack!
Reply to this
Ok getting better moving a long a little faster now!
Spoony getting a lot of screen time!
Brad still a smart ass!
All good signs!
Linkara being set up as a villain.
And bloody violence!
But, i do think that Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis are going to sue somebody!
Reply to this
You see, this is what you fucking pussies fail to understand again. You ever heard of cyberpunk? Have you HEARD of steampunk? This is That80sPunk. This is a brilliant mind who is taking everything that was awesome 80s and putting it into one fucking movie that's set in modern times. Where Doug and everyone else can run around with ghostbusters and indiana jones and nostalgia, and ride around in their ship and FUCK SHIT UP!!
Reply to this
Dammit BenBen, marry me you scoundrel!
Reply to this
"THIS IS THE WORST PIECE OF SHIT EVER"
"WHY, I THOUGHT IT WAS GOOD, THAT MEANS IT WAS GOOD"
"BECAUSE IT IS SHIT AND I DON'T LIKE IT"
"WELL DON'T BITCH ABOUT IT, IT'S YOUR OWN FAULT FOR WATCHING THEM"
"NO ONE'S ALLOWED TO BE NEGATIVE EVER? ONLY POSITIVE COMMENTS ALLOWED? FUCK YOU"
"YOU'RE A DOUCHEBAG, SHUT UP"
"NO YOU'RE A DOUCHEBAG, NOT LETTING ME EXPRESS MY RATIONAL OPINIONS AND AWESOME CRITICISMS"
"FUCK YOU"
"FUCK YOU BACK"
There, I just summarized every single immature fallacious argument that has and will be posted in all the comments sections of the parts of this thing.
Reply to this
Wow, that was atrocious. The movie was alright though.
Reply to this
While I had my problems with the first part, mainly it beeing way too long, I have to say that this was even worse. I mean is it really necessary to blantantly rip off an entire scene from Ghostbusters? That really bothered me since this was nothing clever, there was no own spin to it - it was just an obvious steal. If I want jokes about giant food I will stick with real comedies like Ghostbusters or Attack of the Killer-Tomatoes, thank you very much.
The other major complaint I have with this is Spoony. I usually liked the guy in the previous Anniversaries but this is really too much.Is it really necessary to have Spoony, Turl AND Insano in the film? I would have no problem with little "cameos" like in Kickassia but seeing him integrated into the film in 3 roles (so far) that at times run parallel is way too much for my taste.
I do hope that the next episode will finally shift into gear and get going, so far this anniversary isn't really my thing. Seeing that part 1 was too lomg and part 2 just a jumpled mess I hope part 3 will finally find the right rhythm and flow.
Reply to this
It's these videos that Brad needs to incorporate some form of discipline through banning or removing comments. It's fine liking and disliking, but there comes a time where you guys start getting abusive towards Doug Walker and the rest of the contributors for no reason but for shits and giggles.
Reply to this
No, I'm not going to be banning anyone. Doug is my friend, and no one likes seeing bad stuff written about their friends, but I also don't like the practice of banning comments of people who disagree or dislike something that I post. So they don't like it, that shouldn't take anything away from the people who do like and enjoy it. Plus, honestly, we make fun of stuff all the time on this site and on other sites. It's ok if people make fun of us, that's only fair =)
Reply to this
The only comments that I'd really like to see you ban are the ones that look like obvious spam. I don't come to this site to see vbiowet post about drug arrests. I come here to see you try strange soft drinks and give your friends meat action figures for their birthday!
Reply to this
Yeah, I've gotten rid of a lot of those spam accounts, and spam guard manages to catch a very high percentage of them, but unfortunately some still get through.
Reply to this
and that good sir is a highly admirable and very mature way of looking at things. I think the practice of banning those that dislike something and voice their opinion has, quite frankly, gotten out of hand in a lot of places - TGWTG included. I understand that some people are dicks and completely insufferable, but unfortunately it very often seems that people who have legitimate gripes or opinions that aren't glowingly positive often get lumped in with that lot as well nowadays. So it's nice to be able to post thoughts and comments somewhere without the fear that they'll be met with immediate censorship.
Reply to this
Sorry Foggy, but I have to disagree. Sure there are some people who are assholes, but most of them are being reasonable and expressing their point of view in a coherent, polite, and logical manner. If we have to put up with a few jackasses so that we can actually have a place that allows freedom of speech and legitimate criticism rather than having anybody with a dissenting opinion immediately banned so as to preserve the echo chamber then, as far as I'm concerned, so be it.
Reply to this
I have no problems with anyone who can piece together a coherent criticism for these films, sure they're not high art and won't be to everyone's tastes so they're allowed to voice there opinions. But get rid of the jackasses and people would start becoming less hostile towards one another.
People who like the films would stop getting mocked and ridiculed and those who dislike them would be able to voice there opinions without being so hostile towards the makers.
Reply to this
See and I don't see a whole lot of people being hostile towards anyone. It's mostly just a few here and there, and the bulk of the people being openly hostile and asshole-ish are people who like what they've seen and seem to want to act as if disliking something is somehow against the rules. Those are the people who are openly attacking others for the most part.
Really with rare, rare exception there's nobody really outright being hostile towards the makers on a personal level. And if you start banning the rare exceptions that are assholes the only thing you accomplish is getting things even more hostile as people start being jerks by way of "revenge" for the free speech being repressed.
Reply to this
You can act very well so far in the new TGWTG film you are acting circles around fan faves. continue to act you are good.
Reply to this
This is truth not WELL WRITTEN WITH GOODNESS
Reply to this
Reading through the comments, I just can't WAIT to hear a RadioDrome where Brad, Josh and Brian talk about the fucking bizarre swarm of bitching Snob fanboys that seem to crawl out over this latest crossover! There seems to be more people across these 2 parts saying "you don't ask people who love it why they love!" than people actually saying they love it.
I think I've seen more fuck Doug comments already than "rape faggot Josh" comments over the past year!
Reply to this
I think people are seriously overreacting to a group of fans who don't like something expressing that fact. There's a weird culture of "if you don't like it shut the fuck up!" that I just don't understand.
Reply to this
Yeah, it's an especially weird culture for a group of fans of a program dedicated to watching movies and making fun of them.
Reply to this
Well I do understand, and I am fine with people saying they think it sucks, it's just the vile complete bitching about it every installment and direct slagging off of Doug and co. Honestly so far with To Boldly Flee I'm finding it very hit and miss; some of the jokes seem really good, but then there were the painfully cheap feeling to me personally that felt like padding and contrived, such as "the hole" stuff early on.
Just to show I'm not raging against people for not liking it or anything as a fanboy, just the weird trolling style ones or just really mean-spirited.
Reply to this
Was anyone else bothered by the "keep you on schedule" line? Seemed like a criticism of Spoony's lack of videos
Reply to this
You mean like some kind of foreshadowing to what would happen later? I wasn't bothered by that, but it seems coincidental at least.
I think what's strange right now is that Spoony has way more screen time and characters in this special than any of the other reviewers (maybe second to Nostalgia Critic), yet he's no longer apart of TGWTG. I understand the possible reasons, but it's still weird.
Reply to this
It's another Star Wars reference, actually.
Reply to this
And there I was, thinking my knowledge of Star Wars was at least barely passable
Reply to this
Ah Silver Streak... True Story: I first saw Star Wars:ANH at a midnight showing at a drive in when I was three. It was doubled-billed with Silver Streak. I fell asleep about half-an hour in and my parents despaired that maybe taking a three year old to a midnight showing was a bad idea and I would never wake up to see, let alone last through Star Wars. They were wrong. I woke up about ten minutes before SS ended, got freaked out (if you've seen how the film ends you'll know why) and was wide awake until the end credits started rolling on New Hope. And thus my life was lost to the sweet embrace of endless nerdom...
Reply to this
I hear you! I saw Star Wars when I was 4. I honestly have no older memory. It was at a regular theater, but I remember seeing Buck Rogers at a drive-in. Good times.
Reply to this
I couldn't help but notice the poster in the background plugging Suburban Knights, which reminds me of something the CinemaSnob character might say in response "Don't have a poster of a better movie in your shitty movie." The quote doesn't fit because Suburban Knights was terrible too.
Reply to this
He's not really plugging it, he has the posters of his movies up all the time. When he occasionally does vlog videos, you can see them in the background.
I don't think it's a conscious thing, they're just there because he films in his house.
Reply to this
After reading comments to the video on TSE,AT4W, TGWTG and here I can't help but ask myself how it comes that there are almost 0 critical comments on the other sites.
You could debate that some comments here cross the line of valuable criticism but most keep their comments somewhat coherent and constructive - there is a certain level of discussion while on the other sides there is nothing like that.
I wonder why thats the case - are we overly critical or just not completely blinded fan boys?
Reply to this
The reason you see criticism here and not the other places is, well, no offense to the other sites but they have basically labeled anybody with a criticism as trolls for a very long time, and banned the vast majority of those who would make even the slightest criticism. They've created their own echo chamber. So by comparison the snob comments look more angry and vitriolic than the other sites for the simple fact that dissenting opinion is allowed to be voiced.
Reply to this
Well that makes sense...nothing against a little bit of good ol' fashioned censorship I guess.
Reply to this
Well, in the case of my site while I do approve comments, I do so to ensure I read all the feedback. I rarely have to deal with a legitimate troll post on my blog, and those are the ones that are pretty obviously meant to be ones, using insults or homophobic slurs. Genuine criticism is accepted and sometimes responded to. Other times I don't want to respond to it since I fear giving away spoilers.
I tend to let everything through at least once, but if someone is being demeaning or insulting I basically say on no uncertain terms will it be allowed and if I see another remark like that, it won't go through nor will any other ones they make.
There's a difference between "I'm just not enjoying it / I don't find this funny" and "You all suck and I hate this."
Reply to this
That's a bold faced lie and you know it Linkara. Just let people speak freely on your sites guys! This dictatorship that most of you guys run is exactly why the fandom is so mindless. Just let people mock your, it's alright buddy! You're still gonna make those mad internet dollaz!
Look I said it already but Brad has the right idea, and as a result he's got a bunch of smartass fans with a good sense of humor. Just think about it and hurry up with that power ranger thing, because I love fapping to you explaining power rangers.
Okay maybe not fap...or watch..but you get the idea!
Signed: That jerk who asked for more Power Rangers at MAGfest
PS. Some autistic superman tried punching me for saying that, just to give you an idea of how rabid your fans are.
PPS. I'm coming back next year. Check yourself, sucka.
Reply to this
What movie is that plot from?
"On a long distance train trip, a man finds romance, but also witness a dead man being thrown from the train. When no one believes him, he attempts to solve the mystery himself with the help of a wise cracking car thief."
Sounds intresting...
Reply to this
Silver Streak.
Gene Wilder, Richard Pryor, Jill Clayburgh.
1976.
Director: Arthur Hiller.
Rips off "North by Northwest", kinda.
Reply to this
i'm sorry but if there is THIS Much fucking hate for this film. and film cause it will be 8 parts. than why watch it?
for me i'm having a ball watching it. part 2 wasn't as good as part 1. but that doesn't bother me, cause i may enjoy the next installement.
yes this is a ripoff of various movies, but that doesn't bother me either. Doug i'm sure grew up with all these various films and loves them no doubt. i thought the ghostbusters scene was funny. and well done. this is a tribute to those films no doubt.
it's been done before in films where it mentions about a dozen different movies or has various parts in it. it's NOT a new idea. i don't get the hate for it.
people did the same thing last year for the lsat special,
yet i read more postive things about that this year than i did last year. if you don't like it than don't watch it that's pretty simple. i take it for what it is, a bunch of friends making a film about films they love.
some of it may be cheesy but that can't always be helped. just have fun with it. and don't take it serious i'm not.
Reply to this
I don't hate "To Boldly Flee", I just like pointing out the stuff lifted from other movies.
Reply to this
I like the Anniversary specials, but the problem is that they don't make me laugh. I find them entertaining and interesting enough to keep watching, but there was only a few times in this video that I actually thought were funny. I guess a big part of that is not really getting some of the in-jokes, but a lot of the regular jokes seem to fall flat, too.
Obviously a big part of that is the acting, and how it varies from pretty good to just straight up awful, to the point where it's painful to watch. Spoony has WAY too large of a part in this, and I like him generally.
I really don't think I was supposed to like "Upset Prick" as much as I did either. I hope he's not out of it for good, he was one of the most enjoyable parts.
Reply to this
i dont hate this, but i dont like it every much either. Well afterall acting and directing are professionals. I must say hardly there is anyone that can act besides Brad and Spoony.
The only reason I watch it is because it is free and I'm too goddamn bored.
Reply to this
Part 2 was a little better, though predictable and sometimes pedantic. Some things made me laugh...the Brad/Bennett explaining what happened, JesoOtaku coming in a year late (she was pretty good, honestly), Mickey flipping out. Helped it was way shorter than part one. I hope it's not the end of Elisa because she can definitely act (not bad to look at either). Spoony sure did put in some overtime on this one. Not sure when Brad's big part happens (goes to the dark side?) but looking forward to it. It's good to see Orlando as well as he was great last year and makes me want to see the Snob movie even more.
Reply to this
This got dark in a hurry. Not that I'm complaining
Still, I wonder if we'll see more of Prick, maybe Mechakara can turn his remains into a cyborg or something.
"Hello Neil! Nice to meet you!" at the end was hilarious, like something straight out of a Bugs Bunny cartoon. Looking forward to the inevitable Zod vs Angry Joe clash.
Reply to this
I can honestly say that this was not the worst piece of shit I have ever sat through. Not the worst by a long shot.
Reply to this
I didnt like the first part, but Im not gonna lie...I enjoyed the hell outta this part. for various reasons, and nothing really annoyed me enough to discredit my enjoyment. so yeah i liked it well enough
Reply to this
Finally. After a fucking HOUR, this story is getting somewhere.
Gotta say, I hate how Phelous is so smug about everything, and how some jokes feels so forced.
Reply to this
He's the boyfriend to Obscurus Lupa, so her snark and his dorkiness became smug.
Reply to this
It's bad enough that the real Talents on this Planet(Doug Walker,Brad Jones,and others from Just this show alone)Get Less Notice than some No-Talent Boy Bands that won't go away.(One Direction,anyone?)The People that don't like this don't need to spend this much time Flaming the makers of this all that much,Do they?
Just a thought.
Reply to this
Wow Bard really has my respect for taking the high road and letting people say whatever good or bad, instead of easily censoring anything he wants. What I don't like about to boldly flee and a fair bit of the nostalgia critic episodes of recent(last 4 - 3months), is that dougs writing is really getting stale, I feel burned out watching it. This is compared to say a year ago when I would watch them and laugh no problem, now they just devolved into angry self loathing rants on whatever shit he has to watch that week. There's a real lack of heart and emotion for example that we have seen in some of spooneys reveiws of late. Like the last ultima one, I'm not saying every review has to be citizen kane. But it never hurts to take a break, look for some inspiration in new stuff or older reviews and come back fresh, or even try something new. No one say he has to do nostalgia critic for the next 5 years, some of the best artist change there style and reinvent themselfs in new and intresting ways. Whos to say doug can't entertain without screaming at a camera.
Reply to this
i agree, but now im afraid ill get a 100 people telling me im wrong about my own opinion...lifes a bitch
Reply to this
That's interesting because my enjoyment of NC has been down all year and especially over the last 3 months, but I haven't been able to put my finger on what it's been.
BTW I haven't liked To Boldly Flee but then I gave up on Suburban Knights after just watching two parts.
Reply to this
Ha Ha. I accidently wrote the Captacha in the "Name" box! No wonder it didn't work the first time.
Reply to this
I'm really quite enjoying this series. I just wish they hadn't shown the images of the villains in the beginning of the credits or in the trailers so that General Zod's appearance at the end of the second part would have more impact.
KNEEEEL!!
Reply to this
Colin and Luke Mochrie?
Reply to this
Luke Mochrie (seen here) is comedian Colin Mochrie's son.
Reply to this
Do try and keep up. This was addressed last year, when Suburban Knights was being shown.
I'm just fuckin with ya. Yes, Luke is his son.
Reply to this
No, you misunderstand. Few posts up from me had a 'Colin' complain about the video and replied to by a 'Luke'. Obviously not them but I thought it was funny.
Reply to this
So far, i have only laughed at one joke out of the entire thing, and that was wt the very end of the episode. Brad's giving a great performance but so far he's been given very little to work with. The rest of the jokes just seem poorly executed and/or written to me, but i remain hopeful that it will eventually top the 'kneel' line.
Reply to this
You know what I like about this message board?
Complete and total freedom.
Here, I can say anything I want. If I want to swear, I can swear. If I want to insult these crossover videos, I can do that. If I want to say that Doctor Insano HAS a backstory, I can do that. And if I want to make fun of that thin-skinned pussy bitch Jarkes, I can do that.
In Linkara's blog, Linkara is constantly breathing down our necks, telling what we can or can't say and reacting to the slighest of negative comments like a whiny little kid.
Well, I say fuck that! From now on, I'm commenting here, where I can actually say what I want!
Oh, and Lewis, if you are reading this: if you think I'm the Exiled One, I'm the Exiled One. If you think I'm Jarkes, I'm Jarkes. And if you think I'm Lucky the Leprechaun or Coronel Sanders, I'm them, too. Take your "writing style" and shove it up your zit-infested Trekkie ass.
Fuck the Anniversary Specials, fuck Linkara's blog, fuck off.
Reply to this
Reeeeaaally?
See, if you ARE the Exiled One, you'll notice that I tended to let your comments through all the damn time. You had explicit freedom to say what you wanted as long as you weren't spreading lies or misinformation. Hell, I was still granting you leeway to post EVEN AFTER I caught you trying to impersonate someone else.
I have been exemplary in my patience with you.
However, saying what you want does not deny me the right to respond in turn and call out misconceptions or mistakes. On top of that? Brad's not too fond of posters impersonating other people around here, either, since it's happened before.
Also, when the hell have I EVER denied people the freedom to swear on my comments section? Now you're just making stuff up.
Reply to this
he wanted you attention! he just so lonely
Reply to this
In any case, Linkara has no real power in this board. If this guy is disgusted with Linkara's blog and wants to move permanently to this message board, then there's nothing Linkara can do about it.
Reply to this
Indeed. I don't care about that, anyway. I just object to the idea that somehow my blog is a hive of free speech denial and oppression.
Reply to this
Faggot Josh really needs to stop impersonating Linkara.
Reply to this
In the comments sections of part 1, there's a guy impersonating Mark E. Smith of "The Fall", and Brad had no problem with it.
So, you are full of shit, Linkara.
Reply to this
*Shrugs*
Did anyone report it to him? He was pretty angry a year or two ago when someone was impersonating Kyle Kallgren on the blog.
Reply to this
Obvious impersonations meant as a joke are just that. When somebody is sincerely trying to start shit it's a different world entirely.
Reply to this
Now your`e getting pathetic Lewis.You should seek comfort from this bullying from your friends at the TGWTG "family" of nice PC thug assholes.
Reply to this
I notice that you didn't actually respond to anything I said, and in fact, seemed to just make up something right off the top of your head about me being a "PC thug asshole" even though I stated right in the post how I'm not.
Good job.
Also: your apostrophe in "you're" is in the wrong place and "nice" and "asshole" are contradictions, so saying "nice PC thug assholes?" Are you sure you speak English?
Reply to this
Easy now Lewis, we don`t want you to be diciplined by TGWTG management for "going after fans" now do we? My comment was about you picking fight because of negative comments in general.As many has said, your shitty site is all bout pissing on somebody elses creative effort.It`s poor when you people simply can`t take it.It comes of very self righteous.Demanding detailed explanations for their reasons when TGWTG are built on cheap shots.Oh and yes, continue with the spell checks Lewis! enlighten me!
Reply to this
No offense Lewis, but as much as I understand what you're saying and to some degree agree with it, when you've gotten to the point where you're insulting spelling and grammar in an argument...you've reached the point of petty and immature discourse. Better to just stop arguing with the person than look childish yourself.
Reply to this
You act like the biggest faggot I have ever seen. Don't get me wrong: I don't mean faggot in a homosexual way. I just mean, god, you're a fucking faggot Linkara. Just stick to videos and get off the rest of the internet. I'm sure you're an okay guy in real life.
Reply to this
That is Josh's word!! You do NOT use Josh's word!
Reply to this
Exactly! It's Faggot Josh not Faggot Linkara. Find your own name!
Reply to this
And now Jarkes is crying to Linkara like the pussy he is, and Linkara is all whiny with his "I don't want to delete comments, but I will!" bullshit.
God, the people at that blog are such bitches. Here, we actually have BALLS.
Reply to this
Yep, posting relatively anonymous comments on the internet is pretty much the definition of macho.
Reply to this
Classic Air Jordan Shoes combines the best elements of each version than designed with color schemes attractive and popular with these high top styles among fans of Michael Jordan. As the only model, Jordan Jumphan H Series Shoes with unique design and fascinating look are good for fans of the world.The jordan shoes come in the shiny appearance will give you feel fine.Air Jordan shoes come in the good design that meet the requirement of different athlete.Air Jordan 23 Shoes offer a superior of carbon black with a little white on the back end, contains a pleasant color scheme. That kind of shoes is easy so they match your leisure clothes and pants purchased.
Reply to this
Not gonna lie guys, for a movie about a bunch of guys who whine about everything, it sucks twice as much as the material they usually review.
I think they owe Uwe Bowl an apology.
Reply to this
Ha! Uwe Boll should do a review.
Reply to this
No, he should box the TGWTG crew. Him chasing them around the ring would make for a zillion YouTube videos, poops, and other Internet bullshit.
Reply to this
Observer la Journée gâteau chaud de travail en utilisant repas totalement gratuit ainsi que de donner,louis vuitton site officiel
La pensée même de crêpes toujours avec nous prend habituellement un endroit joyeux. Ma Mère personnel serait amener à devenir le Le matin avant l'organisation religieuse, avec une autre cérémonie de mariage de votre femme peut éventuellement envisager. Le véritable sirop moelleux avantages confortable = Absolute s'il vous plaît. Chaque fois que j'ai fini par être très petite, je voulais y avait une pause des vacances uniques destinés à des petits pains chauds. Certes, mon partenaire et je n'avais pas été le seul être humain à croire que!
Bien Pancake mercredi commence depuis des générations, IHOP ont été spotting Pays Soirée large gâteau chaud dû au fait 2008. En 2010, l'un des meilleur repas dîner va être reconnaissants à Mondy,Sac LV France, 24 Mars. Pour aider à apprécier, IHOP offre tout à fait gratuitement limitée obtenir des crêpes à être en mesure de prospects via 7a-10p. Pour acquérir leur générosité particulier,Sac Louis Vuitton Pas Cher, ils sont curieux famille et les amis d'avoir un don sur le système Miracle enfants. Communauté Sensational votre enfant contient 170 centres médicaux dispensant des meilleurs soins de santé et la recherche médicale pour les enfants.Related articles:
Contenu en relation avec:http://from--www.ipix.com.tw/viewthread.php?tid=1291960&extra=
Reply to this
I laugh at all the butthurt in the comments here. Seriously, can't we just respect each other's opinions and move on with our lives? Dont like it? Fine. Do like it? Fine. So please, people, stop arguing and bitching like spoiled little children and just learn how to take differing opinions. God.
Reply to this
I like trains.
Reply to this
I'm really not sure why people are getting so agitated either way about these videos. Surely it's pretty obvious that TGWTG aren't going for high art with these anniversary movies. They're pretty much just an excuse to get all the reviewers in one place and dressing in silly costumes. Sure it's pandering to the TGWTG super fans but so fucking what? Personally I thought Kickassia was just daft fun, Suburban Knights was boring and this one could go in either direction at the moment but it's entertaining enough. If people hate them fair enough, same if people adore them. I'm just aghast at the influx of people on this website recently who lack any knowledge of the definition of the word "Opinion".
Reply to this
I understand the points you're making David, and there are a few who've obviously decided rather than actually give criticism they just want to "start shit" in these comments. But I have to say I disagree with your point in the overall. Essentially what you've provided here is an excuse for what they've produced to, well, not be very good. Now, whether you think it's good or not I can't get behind that mindset. I get real annoyed at the "it's not meant to be great!" argument. Because this is something they sell to the masses. These are things they expect money for at some point. So in that regard they need to be more than "an excuse to get all the reviewers in one place and dressing in silly costumes." If it was just internet videos I'd agree with you. But the minute they started selling these things on DVD it became open to high scrutiny just like anything else that's meant "for profit" does.
Reply to this
Well I'm not suggesting that it should be exempt from criticism simply because it's "free" or "just an internet video" or whatever nor am I particularly trying to defend it (personally I thought part 3 was pretty bad), more so I'm just pointing out that it's a series clearly tailored to quite a specific audience and IF it pleases that audience then it can be considered successful to a certain degree at least. At the end of the day it's pretty blatant fan-service and I'm sure the DVD's are going to be aimed squarely at people who are already rather big TGWTG fans as opposed to the average Joe on the street. Really I'm just confused as to why people who vehemently hate TGWTG would bother to watch it and make fiercely negative comments about both the series and about those who do happen to enjoy it. I'm certainly not saying people shouldn't be criticising it, more just pointing out that by it's nature this kind of series is going to be pretty alienating to people outside of a certain fanbase.
Reply to this
I think the people who watch it that "vehemently hate" TGWTG really are doing so because, in spite of that hate, they like some of the individuals involved. Be it Brad, Spoony, or whoever. So they feel almost obligated to watch it because they like at least some of the people involved in it's creation. Those making the really fiercely negative comments about those who enjoy it are just assholes, and a cursory glance at the comments will reveal an extreme minority of assholes to boot.
I agree that these series are obviously designed to, for lack of a better less negative sounding word that I can come up with off the top of my head, pander to the fanbase. For me that's part of the problem. If you're going to make a movie or miniseries of this kind, and expect to get money from them, it seems to me that they should at least try to reach a broader audience. Sure they might not reach a broader audience monetarily, but at the very least it could have some appeal beyond just those people who watch the videos online. It could become a movie you could watch with friends that don't already know everything about the site and the reviewers.
That alongside what I see as declining quality, lazy writings, and references as jokes - which Film Brain has rather ironically taught us are not actually jokes - has left me kind of disappointed in this so far. The first part was a great start in my opinion, and it's been downhill fast since then.
Reply to this
The people who are saying this sucks because of how it is acted or shot have some solid points, this isn't a hollywood shoot or even a Brad Jones production though, the Walkers could only get all these people together fur a limited amount of time.
The fact that some scenes were shot by the reviewers themselves is testament to that but if you're watching this you can't let that distract you from its merits.
Now don't get me wrong, I enjoyed some of the gags and loved seeing some of my favorite reviewers like Sage and Brad play off each other but I thought it dragged at times and all in all has been less enjoyable than Kickassia so far. All I'm saying is, give it a fair chance and don't just bash something for trolls sake.
Reply to this
The people who are saying this sucks because of how it is acted or shot have some solid points. They should realise that this isn't a Hollywood shoot or even a Brad Jones production though.
The Walkers could only get all these people together for a limited amount of time.
The fact that some scenes were shot by the reviewers themselves is testament to that, if you're watching this movie you can't let those things distract you from its merits.
Now don't get me wrong, I enjoyed some of the gags and loved seeing some of my favorite reviewers like Sage and Brad play off each other but I thought it dragged at times and all in all has been less enjoyable than Kickassia so far. All I'm saying is, give it a fair chance and don't just bash something for trolls sake.
Reply to this